Dhalla Z, Bruni J, Sutton J
Division of Neurology, Wellesley Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 1991 Feb;18(1):66-8. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100031310.
We compared the efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) with conventional carbamazepine (CBZ) in 131 epileptic patients (both men and women, ages 6-65 years) in an open, multicentre, cross-over trial. Patients entered into the trial were previously on CBZ monotherapy or polytherapy. During the first 4 weeks, patients were treated with equivalent daily doses of CBZ and then switched to CBZ-CR for the subsequent 4 weeks. The majority of patients were switched to the more convenient b.i.d. dosing schedule of the controlled-release (CR) preparation without a detrimental effect on seizure frequency or adverse effects. In 44/131 (34%) of patients, the switch to CBZ-CR was accompanied by an improvement in tolerability, primarily due to a reduction in peak-dependent CNS side-effects such as tiredness, double or blurred vision, dizziness and ataxia. At the end of the study, investigators preferred CBZ-CR for 76% of their patients and 70% of the patients preferred CBZ-CR.
在一项开放性、多中心、交叉试验中,我们比较了控释卡马西平(CBZ-CR)与传统卡马西平(CBZ)对131例癫痫患者(年龄6至65岁,男女均有)的疗效和耐受性。进入试验的患者此前接受过CBZ单药治疗或联合治疗。在最初4周,患者接受等效日剂量的CBZ治疗,随后4周换用CBZ-CR。大多数患者换用了更方便的控释(CR)制剂每日两次给药方案,且对癫痫发作频率或不良反应无不利影响。在44/131例(34%)患者中,换用CBZ-CR后耐受性有所改善,主要是由于与峰值相关的中枢神经系统副作用如疲劳、复视或视物模糊、头晕和共济失调有所减少。在研究结束时,76%的研究者倾向于让其患者使用CBZ-CR,70%的患者更倾向于使用CBZ-CR。