Suppr超能文献

一项非盲法、随机多中心试验,比较拉莫三嗪与丙戊酸盐联合用药和缓释卡马西平单药治疗作为初治癫痫初始药物方案的疗效。

Unblinded, randomized multicenter trial comparing lamotrigine and valproate combination with controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy as initial drug regimen in untreated epilepsy.

作者信息

Lee Byung In, No Soon Kee, Yi Sang-Doe, Lee Hyang Woon, Kim Ok Joon, Kim Sang Ho, Kim Myeong Kyu, Kim Sung Eun, Kim Yo Sik, Kim Jae Moon, Lee Se-Jin, Shin Dong Jin, Park Sung Pa, Kim Yeong In, Heo Kyoung, Cho Yong Won, Cho Yang-Je, Kim Youn Nam

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Neurology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Department of Neurology, Bong Seng Memorial Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Seizure. 2018 Feb;55:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy (CBZ-CR) with lamotrigine and valproate combination therapy (LTG + VPA) in equivalent total drug load, as initial drug regimen in untreated patients with partial and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).

METHODS

This unblinded, randomized, 60-week superiority trial recruited patients having two or more unprovoked seizures with at least one seizure during previous three months. After randomization into CBZ-CR or LTG + VPA, patients entered into eight-week titration phase (TP), followed by 52-week maintenance phase (MP). Median doses of CBZ-CR and LTG + VPA were 600 mg/day and 75 mg/day + 500 mg/day, respectively. Primary outcome measure was completion rate (CR), a proportion of patients who have completed the 60-week study as planned. Secondary efficacy measures included seizure-free rate (SFR) for 52-week of MP and time to first seizure (TTFS) during MP.

RESULTS

Among 207 randomized patients, 202 underwent outcome analysis (104 in CBZ-CR, 98 in LTG + VPA). CR was 62.5% in CBZ-CR and 65.3% in LTG + VPA (p = 0.678). SFR during MP was higher in LTG + VPA (64.1%) than CBZ-CR (47.8%) (P = 0.034). TTFS was shorter with CBZ-CR (p = 0.041). Incidence of adverse effects (AEs) were 57.7% in CBZ-CR and 60.2% in LTG + VPA and premature drug withdrawal rates due to AEs were 12.5% and 7.1%, respectively, which were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

CR was comparable between LTG + VPA and CBZ-CR, however, both SFR for 52-week MP and TTFS during MP were in favor of LTG + VPA than CBZ-CR. The study suggested that LTG + VPA can be an option as initial drug regimen for untreated patients with partial seizures and/or GTCS except for women of reproductive age.

摘要

目的

比较控释卡马西平单药治疗(CBZ-CR)与拉莫三嗪和丙戊酸盐联合治疗(LTG + VPA)在等效总药物负荷下,作为初治部分性发作和/或全面性强直-阵挛发作(GTCS)患者的初始药物治疗方案的效果。

方法

这项非盲、随机、为期60周的优效性试验招募了在过去三个月内有两次或更多次无诱因发作且至少有一次发作的患者。随机分为CBZ-CR组或LTG + VPA组后,患者进入为期8周的滴定期(TP),随后是52周的维持期(MP)。CBZ-CR和LTG + VPA的中位剂量分别为600毫克/天和75毫克/天 + 500毫克/天。主要结局指标是完成率(CR),即按计划完成60周研究的患者比例。次要疗效指标包括MP期52周的无发作率(SFR)和MP期首次发作时间(TTFS)。

结果

在207例随机分组的患者中,202例进行了结局分析(CBZ-CR组104例,LTG + VPA组98例)。CBZ-CR组的CR为62.5%,LTG + VPA组为65.3%(p = 0.678)。LTG + VPA组MP期的SFR(64.1%)高于CBZ-CR组(47.8%)(P = 0.034)。CBZ-CR组的TTFS较短(p = 0.041)。不良反应(AE)发生率在CBZ-CR组为57.7%,在LTG + VPA组为60.2%,因AE导致的提前停药率分别为12.5%和7.1%,两者无显著差异。

结论

LTG + VPA组和CBZ-CR组的CR相当,然而,MP期52周的SFR和MP期的TTFS均显示LTG + VPA组优于CBZ-CR组。该研究表明,对于初治的部分性发作和/或GTCS患者(育龄期女性除外),LTG + VPA可作为初始药物治疗方案的一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验