Suppr超能文献

使用磁共振成像准确评估脊柱后方韧带复合体损伤:外科医生和放射科医生的前瞻性比较。

Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Apr;12(4):391-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.10.SPINE08742.

Abstract

OBJECT

Magnetic resonance imaging has been proposed as a powerful technique for assessing the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) in spinal trauma. Because MR imaging is often used to determine appropriate treatment, it is important to determine the accuracy and reliability of MR imaging in diagnosing PLC disruption. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the radiologist and surgeon to assess disruption of the PLC in the setting of acute cervical and thoracolumbar trauma using MR imaging.

METHODS

The components of the PLC in 89 consecutive patients with cervical or thoracolumbar fractures following acute spinal trauma were evaluated using MR imaging by both a musculoskeletal radiologist and an independent spine surgeon and assessed intraoperatively under direct visualization by the treating surgeon. The MR imaging interpretations of the musculoskeletal radiologist and surgeon were compared with the intraoperative report for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. A comparison between the radiologist's and spine surgeon's accuracy of MR imaging interpretation was performed.

RESULTS

The agreement between both the spine surgeon's and radiologist's MR imaging interpretation and the actual intraoperative findings was moderate for most components of the PLC. Overall, the MR imaging interpretation of the surgeon was more accurate than that of the radiologist. The interpretation of MR imaging by the surgeon had negative predictive value and sensitivity of up to 100%. However, the specificity of MR imaging for both the surgeon and radiologist was lower, ranging from 51.5 to 80.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the MR imaging interpretations between surgeon and radiologist indicates that the surgeon was more accurate for some PLC components. The relatively low positive predictive value and specificity for MR imaging in assessing PLC integrity suggests that both the surgeon and radiologist tend to overdiagnose PLC injury using MR imaging. This can lead to unnecessary surgeries if only MR imaging is used for treatment decision making.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)已被提议作为评估脊柱创伤后后韧带复合体(PLC)完整性的强大技术。由于 MRI 常用于确定合适的治疗方法,因此确定 MRI 诊断 PLC 破裂的准确性和可靠性非常重要。本研究的目的是比较放射科医生和外科医生在急性颈椎和胸腰椎创伤背景下使用 MRI 评估 PLC 中断的能力。

方法

通过肌肉骨骼放射科医生和独立的脊柱外科医生使用 MRI 评估 89 例连续急性脊柱创伤后颈椎或胸腰椎骨折患者的 PLC 成分,并由治疗外科医生在直视下进行术中评估。比较肌肉骨骼放射科医生和外科医生的 MRI 解释的准确性、敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。还比较了放射科医生和脊柱外科医生对 MRI 解释准确性的比较。

结果

对于 PLC 的大多数成分,外科医生和放射科医生的 MRI 解释与实际术中发现之间的一致性为中度。总体而言,外科医生的 MRI 解释比放射科医生更准确。外科医生的 MRI 解释具有高达 100%的阴性预测值和敏感性。但是,外科医生和放射科医生的 MRI 特异性较低,范围为 51.5%至 80.5%。

结论

外科医生和放射科医生之间的 MRI 解释比较表明,外科医生对某些 PLC 成分的诊断更准确。评估 PLC 完整性的 MRI 的阳性预测值和特异性相对较低,这表明外科医生和放射科医生倾向于使用 MRI 过度诊断 PLC 损伤。如果仅使用 MRI 进行治疗决策,则可能导致不必要的手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验