University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01305.x.
Rationale Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are a leading cause of hospitalization. Suboptimal inhospital management is expected to lead to more frequent exacerbations and recurrent hospital admission, and is associated with increased mortality. Aims To explore inhospital management of COPD and to compare the results with recommendations from international guidelines. Methods A literature search was carried out for relevant articles published 2000-2009 in the databases Medline, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Invert. In addition, the reference lists of the selected articles were examined. Main inclusion criteria were as follows: COPD, exacerbation, hospitalization, description of inpatient management, and clinical trials. Assessment and treatment strategies in different studies were analysed and compared with American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines. Outcomes were analysed. Results Seven eligible studies were selected. Non-pharmacological treatment was infrequently explored. When compared with international guidelines, diagnostic assessment and therapy were suboptimal, especially non-pharmacological treatment. Respiratory physicians were more likely to perform recommended interventions than non-respiratory physicians. Conclusions Adherence to international guidelines is low for inhospital management of COPD exacerbations, especially in terms of non-pharmacological treatment. Further investigation is recommended to explore strategies like care pathways that improve performance of recommended interventions.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重是住院的主要原因。住院管理不善预计会导致更频繁的加重和再次住院,并与死亡率增加有关。
探索 COPD 的住院管理,并将结果与国际指南的建议进行比较。
对 2000 年至 2009 年在 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、护理与联合健康文献累积索引和 Invert 数据库中发表的相关文章进行了文献检索。此外,还检查了选定文章的参考文献列表。主要纳入标准为:COPD、加重、住院、住院管理描述和临床试验。分析了不同研究中的评估和治疗策略,并与美国胸科学会-欧洲呼吸学会和全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议指南进行了比较。分析了结果。
选择了 7 项符合条件的研究。很少探讨非药物治疗。与国际指南相比,诊断评估和治疗不理想,尤其是非药物治疗。与非呼吸科医生相比,呼吸科医生更有可能实施推荐的干预措施。
COPD 加重的住院管理对国际指南的依从性较低,特别是在非药物治疗方面。建议进一步研究改善推荐干预措施实施的策略,如护理途径。