Seys Deborah, Bruyneel Luk, Deneckere Svin, Kul Seval, Van der Veken Liz, van Zelm Ruben, Sermeus Walter, Panella Massimiliano, Vanhaecht Kris
Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Quality Management, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180398. eCollection 2017.
An increased need for efficiency and effectiveness in today's healthcare system urges professionals to improve the organization of care. Care pathways are an important tool to achieve this. The overall aim of this study was to analyze if care pathways lead to better organization of care processes. For this, the Care Process Self-Evaluation tool (CPSET) was used to evaluate how healthcare professionals perceive the organization of care processes. Based on information from 2692 health care professionals gathered between November 2007 and October 2011 we audited 261 care processes in 108 organizations. Multilevel analysis was used to compare care processes without and with care pathways and analyze if care pathways led to better organization of care processes. A significant difference between care processes with and without care pathways was found. A care pathway in use led to significant better scores on the overall CPSET scale (p<0.001) and its subscales, "coordination of care" (p<0.001) and "follow-up of care" (p<0.001). Physicians had the highest score on the overall CPSET scale and the five subscales. Care processes organized by care pathways had a 2.6 times higher probability that the care process was well-organized. In around 75% of the cases a care pathway led to better organized care processes. Care processes supported by care pathways were better organized, but not all care pathways were well-organized. Managers can use care pathways to make healthcare professionals more aware of their role in the organization of the care process.
当今医疗体系对效率和效能的需求日益增加,促使专业人员改进护理组织。护理路径是实现这一目标的重要工具。本研究的总体目标是分析护理路径是否能带来更好的护理流程组织。为此,使用护理流程自我评估工具(CPSET)来评估医疗专业人员对护理流程组织的看法。基于2007年11月至2011年10月期间收集的2692名医疗专业人员的信息,我们对108个组织中的261个护理流程进行了审核。采用多水平分析来比较有无护理路径的护理流程,并分析护理路径是否能带来更好的护理流程组织。发现有无护理路径的护理流程之间存在显著差异。使用护理路径能在CPSET总体量表(p<0.001)及其子量表“护理协调”(p<0.001)和“护理随访”(p<0.001)上获得显著更高的分数。医生在CPSET总体量表和五个子量表上得分最高。由护理路径组织的护理流程护理流程组织良好的可能性高出2.6倍。在大约75%的案例中,护理路径带来了更好的护理流程组织。由护理路径支持的护理流程组织得更好,但并非所有护理路径都组织良好。管理者可以利用护理路径让医疗专业人员更加意识到他们在护理流程组织中的作用。