Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 4th Floor, Leuven B-3000, Belgium.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01130.x.
Surgeons realize that safe and efficient care processes for total joint replacement requires more than just well-performed operations. Orthopaedic teams are reorganizing care process to improve efficacy and shorten length of stay. Little is known on the impact of organizational changes on patient outcome. This paper studies the relation between the organization of care processes and patient outcomes in hip and knee. Clinical pathways are used as one of the methods to structure the care process. Although evidence is available on the effect of pathways in total joint replacement, their impact with the organization of the care process has not been studied previously.
A cross-sectional multicentre study was performed on 39 care processes and 737 consecutive patients. Regression models were used to analyse the relation between the organization of the care process and risk-adjusted patient outcomes. The use of pathways and the organization of the care process, measured by the Care Process Self Evaluation Tool (CPSET), were measured at organizational level. Length of stay, pain, mobility and elapsed time to discharge were measured at patient level.
The use of pathways had a positive effect on four out of five subscales and the overall CPSET score. Using pathways decreased length of stay (P = 0.014), pain (P = 0.052) and elapsed time to discharge (P = 0.003). The CPSET subscale communication was related with three risk adjusted outcomes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant effect by three different variables on the length of stay; (1) use of pathways; (2) coordination of care processes; and (3) communication with patients and family. Both the use of pathways and coordination of the care process were determinants for the elapsed time to discharge. A significant interaction effect was found between use of pathways and coordination of the care process.
This large multicentre study revealed the relation between the use of pathways, organization of the care process and patient outcomes. This information is important for both clinicians and managers to understand and further improve the organization of orthopaedic care.
Level I prognostic study.
外科医生意识到,安全高效的全关节置换护理流程不仅仅需要手术操作精湛。矫形团队正在重新组织护理流程,以提高疗效并缩短住院时间。但是,对于组织结构变化对患者结果的影响知之甚少。本文研究了髋关节和膝关节护理流程组织与患者结果之间的关系。临床路径被用作构建护理流程的方法之一。尽管有证据表明路径对全关节置换有影响,但它们对护理流程组织的影响尚未得到研究。
对 39 个护理流程和 737 例连续患者进行了横断面多中心研究。使用回归模型分析护理流程组织与风险调整后患者结局之间的关系。在组织层面测量了路径的使用和护理流程的组织,使用护理流程自我评估工具(CPSET)进行测量。在患者层面测量了住院时间、疼痛、活动能力和出院时间。
路径的使用对五个子量表中的四个和 CPSET 总分有积极影响。使用路径可缩短住院时间(P = 0.014)、减轻疼痛(P = 0.052)和缩短出院时间(P = 0.003)。CPSET 量表的沟通与三个风险调整后的结果相关。多变量分析显示,有三个不同变量对住院时间有显著影响;(1)使用路径;(2)护理流程的协调;(3)与患者和家属的沟通。路径的使用和护理流程的协调都是出院时间的决定因素。还发现路径的使用和护理流程的协调之间存在显著的交互效应。
这项大型多中心研究揭示了路径的使用、护理流程的组织和患者结果之间的关系。这对于临床医生和管理人员来说都是重要的信息,有助于理解和进一步改善矫形护理的组织。
I 级预后研究。