Department of Biology and Environmental Studies Program, New York University, 1009 Silver Center, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10002, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 May 12;365(1545):1317-22. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0019.
The principle of maximum entropy production (MEP) seeks to better understand a large variety of the Earth's environmental and ecological systems by postulating that processes far from thermodynamic equilibrium will 'adapt to steady states at which they dissipate energy and produce entropy at the maximum possible rate'. Our aim in this 'outside view', invited by Axel Kleidon, is to focus on what we think is an outstanding challenge for MEP and for irreversible thermodynamics in general: making specific predictions about the relative contribution of individual processes to entropy production. Using studies that compared entropy production in the atmosphere of a dry versus humid Earth, we show that two systems might have the same entropy production rate but very different internal dynamics of dissipation. Using the results of several of the papers in this special issue and a thought experiment, we show that components of life-containing systems can evolve to either lower or raise the entropy production rate. Our analysis makes explicit fundamental questions for MEP that should be brought into focus: can MEP predict not just the overall state of entropy production of a system but also the details of the sub-systems of dissipaters within the system? Which fluxes of the system are those that are most likely to be maximized? How it is possible for MEP theory to be so domain-neutral that it can claim to apply equally to both purely physical-chemical systems and also systems governed by the 'laws' of biological evolution? We conclude that the principle of MEP needs to take on the issue of exactly how entropy is produced.
最大熵产生(MEP)原理通过假定远离热力学平衡的过程将“适应于它们以最大可能速率耗散能量并产生熵的稳定状态”,试图更好地理解地球的各种环境和生态系统。我们在 Axel Kleidon 邀请的这种“外部视角”中的目的是关注我们认为 MEP 一般的一个突出挑战:对单个过程对熵产生的相对贡献做出具体预测。我们使用比较干燥和潮湿地球大气中熵产生的研究表明,两个系统可能具有相同的熵产生率,但耗散的内部动力学却非常不同。利用本期特刊中的几篇论文的结果和一个思维实验,我们表明包含生命的系统的组成部分可以进化为降低或提高熵产生率。我们的分析明确了 MEP 应关注的基本问题:MEP 是否不仅可以预测系统的整体熵产生状态,还可以预测系统中耗散器的子系统的细节?系统的哪些通量最有可能被最大化?MEP 理论如何能够如此中立于领域,以至于它可以声称同样适用于纯粹的物理化学系统以及受“生物进化”规律支配的系统?我们的结论是,MEP 原则需要解决熵是如何产生的确切问题。