Department of Physics, Acoustics Laboratory, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2107-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3337228.
The majority of acoustic impact studies developed over the last 50 years have used a similar acoustic parameter (L(eq), L(dn)) but the noise mapping methodology has been very uneven. The selection of the measurement points, the measurement periods, or the evaluation indices have not followed a unique criterion. Therefore, it is not possible to compare the sound pollution levels between different cities from those studies, at least in a rigorous sense. Even more, different studies carried out in the same city by different researchers during different years and using different methodologies are not conclusive whether the acoustic pollution increases or decreases. The present paper shows results, with statistical significance, about the evolution of the acoustic pollution obtained for two Spanish cities, Pamplona and Madrid. In both cases, it can be concluded that noise pollution decreases over time (P<0.01).
在过去的 50 年中,大多数声学影响研究都使用了类似的声学参数(L(eq)、L(dn)),但噪声图法的应用非常不均衡。测量点的选择、测量时段或评估指标都没有遵循一个统一的标准。因此,从这些研究中,至少不能严格地比较不同城市的声污染水平。更有甚者,同一城市的不同研究者在不同年份、使用不同方法学开展的不同研究也无法确定声污染是增加了还是减少了。本文展示了具有统计学意义的结果,说明了西班牙的潘普洛纳和马德里这两个城市的声污染随时间的演变。在这两种情况下,都可以得出噪声污染随时间减少的结论(P<0.01)。