D-MTEC Public and Organizational Health, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2301-11. doi: 10.1121/1.3337234.
This article reports a field study on noise annoyance from military shooting with small, midsize, and heavy weapons that was carried out among 1002 residents living near eight different training grounds of the Swiss army. The goal of the study was to derive the exposure-annoyance relationship for military shooting noise in communities in the vicinity of average military training grounds. Annoyance was determined in a telephone survey by means of the 5-point verbal and 11-point numerical annoyance scale recommended by the International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise. Exposure was calculated using acoustical source models of weapons and numbers of shots fired, as recorded by the army. Annoyance predictor variables investigated were L(AE), L(CE), L(CE)-L(AE), number of shots above threshold, as well as individual moderators. Exposure-annoyance relationships were modeled by means of linear and logistic regression analyses. The sound exposure level L(E) of shooting noise better explained variations in annoyance than other operational and/or acoustical predictors. Annoyance on the 5-point scale was more closely related to noise exposure than expressed on the 11-point scale. The inclusion of the C-A frequency weighting difference as a second explaining variable, as suggested earlier, did not substantially enhance the predictability of high annoyance.
这篇文章报道了一项针对小型、中型和重型武器军事射击噪声烦恼的现场研究,该研究在居住在瑞士军队 8 个不同训练场附近的 1002 名居民中进行。研究的目的是推导出在平均军事训练场附近社区中军事射击噪声的暴露-烦恼关系。烦恼通过电话调查确定,使用国际噪声生物效应委员会推荐的 5 点口头和 11 点数字烦恼量表。使用武器的声学源模型和军队记录的射击次数计算暴露量。调查的烦恼预测变量包括 L(AE)、L(CE)、L(CE)-L(AE)、超过阈值的射击次数以及个体调节变量。通过线性和逻辑回归分析对暴露-烦恼关系进行建模。射击噪声的声暴露级 L(E)比其他操作和/或声学预测变量更好地解释了烦恼的变化。在 5 点量表上的烦恼与噪声暴露的关系比在 11 点量表上更密切。如前所述,包含 C-A 频率加权差作为第二个解释变量并没有显著提高高烦恼的可预测性。