Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Sep;4(3):236-46. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0121-2. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
This study empirically assessed emotional and sexual functioning, reproductive concerns, and quality of life (QOL) of cancer-related infertile women in comparison to those without a cancer history and explored awareness of third-party reproduction options in cancer survivors.
One hundred twenty-two cancer survivors (Gynecologic and Bone Marrow/Stem Cell Transplant) with cancer-related infertility and 50 non-cancer infertile women completed a self-report survey assessing: reproductive concerns (RCS), mood (CES D), distress (IES), sexual function (FSFI), menopause (SCL), QOL (SF 12), relationships (ADAS), and exploratory (reproductive options) items.
Cancer survivors exhibited greater sexual dysfunction and lower physical QOL than non-cancer infertile women (P < 0.001). No significant group differences were identified for mood (CES-D), mental health QOL (SF-12), reproductive concerns (RCS), and relationship satisfaction (ADAS). All groups scored in the FSFI range of sexual dysfunction, and with RCS scores above published means. Multivariate comparisons showed comparable depression and distress levels for all groups, but cancer survivors had poorer physical QOL [F(5,146)=4.22, P < 0.01]. A significant effect was also found for knowledge of third-party reproductive options on depression and distress levels [F(3,97)=4.62,P < 0.01]. Adjusted means demonstrated higher depression and distress scores for women with perceived unmet informational needs.
Overall, loss of fertility was an emotionally challenging experience for women regardless of its cause. Cancer survivors were found to have lower scores of physical QOL and sexual function than non-cancer infertile women. Unmet informational needs about reproductive options appeared to be associated with negative mood and increased distress in cancer survivors.
Targeted interventions to increase knowledge about reproductive options could be of great assistance to women pursuing parenthood in cancer survivorship. Additionally, intervention studies to improve sexual functioning and QOL in women with cancer-related infertility should be a priority of future research.
本研究通过实证评估了癌症相关不孕女性与无癌症史女性的情感和性功能、生殖关注以及生活质量(QOL),并探讨了癌症幸存者对第三方生殖选择的认知。
122 名癌症幸存者(妇科和骨髓/干细胞移植)和 50 名非癌症不孕女性完成了一份自我报告调查,评估了生殖关注(RCS)、情绪(CES-D)、困扰(IES)、性功能(FSFI)、绝经(SCL)、生活质量(SF-12)、人际关系(ADAS)和探索性(生殖选择)项目。
癌症幸存者的性功能障碍较严重,生活质量(SF-12)较低(P<0.001)。在情绪(CES-D)、心理健康 QOL(SF-12)、生殖关注(RCS)和关系满意度(ADAS)方面,两组间无显著差异。所有组的性功能障碍评分均处于 FSFI 范围内,RCS 评分高于发表的平均值。多变量比较显示,所有组的抑郁和困扰水平相当,但癌症幸存者的生活质量(SF-12)较低(F(5,146)=4.22,P<0.01)。研究还发现,对第三方生殖选择的认知对抑郁和困扰水平有显著影响(F(3,97)=4.62,P<0.01)。调整后的均值显示,对生殖选择信息需求未得到满足的女性,抑郁和困扰得分更高。
总体而言,无论不孕原因如何,失去生育能力对女性来说都是一种情感上的挑战。与非癌症不孕女性相比,癌症幸存者的生活质量(SF-12)和性功能较低。对生殖选择的信息需求未得到满足似乎与癌症幸存者的负面情绪和增加的困扰有关。
增加对生殖选择的认知的针对性干预可能对癌症幸存者生育子女有很大帮助。此外,改善癌症相关不孕女性性功能和生活质量的干预研究应成为未来研究的重点。