• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对国产自有品牌、国产商店自有品牌和进口商店自有品牌牛肉的质量感知。

Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.

机构信息

CIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Produção Animal e Segurança Alimentar, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2010 Jan;84(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.037. Epub 2009 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.037
PMID:20374754
Abstract

This study investigated the differences in the consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef. Partial Least Squares analysis is used for modelling the quality perception process. Results show that consumers perceived national branded Carnalentejana beef, as better on all quality cues and quality aspects than the other two store branded beefs. Preference for Carnalentejana beef stayed highly consistent even after the blind test, where consumers differentiated this beef from the other two beef brands on all sensory dimensions: taste, tenderness, and juiciness, and chose it as the preferred one. Consumers utilized more perceived intrinsic cues to infer expected eating quality of store branded beefs.

摘要

本研究调查了消费者对国产自有品牌、国产商店自有品牌和进口商店自有品牌牛肉的质量感知差异。偏最小二乘分析用于建立质量感知过程模型。结果表明,消费者认为国产 Carnalentejana 牛肉在所有质量线索和质量方面都优于其他两种商店自有品牌牛肉。即使在盲测之后,消费者对 Carnalentejana 牛肉的偏好仍然高度一致,他们可以根据所有感官维度(味道、嫩度和多汁性)区分这种牛肉和其他两种牛肉品牌,并选择它作为首选。消费者更多地利用感知内在线索来推断商店自有品牌牛肉的预期食用质量。

相似文献

1
Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.消费者对国产自有品牌、国产商店自有品牌和进口商店自有品牌牛肉的质量感知。
Meat Sci. 2010 Jan;84(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.037. Epub 2009 Aug 23.
2
Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers.影响澳大利亚牛肉购买群体购买品牌牛肉倾向的因素。
Meat Sci. 2013 Jun;94(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
3
European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.欧洲牛肉消费者对牛肉食用质量保证的兴趣——四项欧盟国家定性研究的观点。
Appetite. 2010 Apr;54(2):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
4
Use of cluster analysis and preference mapping to evaluate consumer acceptability of choice and select bovine M. longissimus lumborum steaks cooked to various end-point temperatures.使用聚类分析和偏好图谱来评估消费者对选择的可接受性,并选择不同终点温度烹饪的牛背最长肌牛排。
Meat Sci. 2010 Jan;84(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
5
Consumer perception of bread quality.消费者对面包品质的认知。
Appetite. 2009 Aug;53(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
6
A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.不同信息场景下消费者对美国和西班牙高品质牛肉的感官接受度、购买意愿及支付意愿的比较。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Oct;87(10):3392-402. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1611. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
7
European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety.欧洲消费者对提高牛肉安全性的包装技术的反应。
Meat Sci. 2011 Sep;89(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
8
Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.利用澳大利亚肉类标准体系预测法国牛肉食用品质。
Animal. 2013 Mar;7(3):524-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001553. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
9
European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.欧洲公民和消费者对牛肉和猪肉的态度和偏好。
Meat Sci. 2010 Feb;84(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 8.
10
The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef.技术信息对牛肉消费者期望和喜好的影响。
Meat Sci. 2012 Feb;90(2):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' Preferences towards Bread Characteristics Based on Food-Related Lifestyles: Insights from Slovenia.基于与食品相关生活方式的消费者对面包特性的偏好:来自斯洛文尼亚的见解
Foods. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):3766. doi: 10.3390/foods12203766.
2
Changes in the Current Patterns of Beef Consumption and Consumer Behavior Trends-Cross-Cultural Study Brazil-Spain-Turkey.牛肉消费当前模式的变化与消费者行为趋势——巴西-西班牙-土耳其跨文化研究
Foods. 2023 Jan 19;12(3):475. doi: 10.3390/foods12030475.
3
A taste of things to come: Effect of temporal order of information and product experience on evaluation of healthy and sustainable plant-based products.
未来趋势初窥:信息的时间顺序和产品体验对健康且可持续的植物基产品评价的影响
Front Nutr. 2022 Sep 8;9:983856. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.983856. eCollection 2022.
4
Effect of Geographical Indication Information on Consumer Acceptability of Cooked Aromatic Rice.地理标志信息对熟香米消费者接受度的影响。
Foods. 2020 Dec 11;9(12):1843. doi: 10.3390/foods9121843.
5
Which product characteristics are preferred by Chinese consumers when choosing pork? A conjoint analysis on perceived quality of selected pork attributes.中国消费者在选择猪肉时更喜欢哪些产品特性?对所选猪肉属性的感知质量进行联合分析。
Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jan 22;5(3):770-775. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.457. eCollection 2017 May.