Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍的冲动性:自我报告测量受损,但行为抑制未受损。

Impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: impairment in self-report measures, but not behavioral inhibition.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2010;43(3):180-8. doi: 10.1159/000304174. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impulsivity is a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, previous clinical and experimental studies investigating impulsivity in BPD rendered mixed results. In this study, impulsivity was assessed by self-report scales and behavioral inhibition tasks to compare different data levels.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

Fifteen women with BPD and 15 matched healthy control subjects (HC) completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Eysenck's Impulsivity Questionnaire and the UPPS (Urgency, Lack of Perseverance, Lack of Premeditation and Sensation Seeking) scale, and participated in a Stroop task, an antisaccade task and a stop signal task.

RESULTS

Patients with BPD scored significantly higher on self-report measures as compared to HC, but not in behavioral tests. In BPD patients, but not in HC, behavioral inhibition errors were correlated with more intense emotional state.

CONCLUSION

We found a discrepancy between self-report and behavioral data. Further studies need to assess additional possible mechanisms underlying increased impulsivity, their relation to emotional instability, and their neurobiological underpinnings.

摘要

背景

冲动是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的核心特征。然而,先前关于 BPD 冲动的临床和实验研究结果不一。在这项研究中,通过自我报告量表和行为抑制任务评估冲动,以比较不同的数据水平。

采样和方法

15 名 BPD 女性和 15 名匹配的健康对照组(HC)完成了巴瑞特冲动量表、艾森克冲动问卷和 UPPS(冲动、缺乏毅力、缺乏预谋和寻求刺激)量表,并参与了 Stroop 任务、反扫视任务和停止信号任务。

结果

与 HC 相比,BPD 患者在自我报告测量中得分明显更高,但在行为测试中并非如此。在 BPD 患者中,但在 HC 中没有,行为抑制错误与更强烈的情绪状态相关。

结论

我们发现自我报告和行为数据之间存在差异。需要进一步研究来评估增加冲动的其他可能机制、它们与情绪不稳定的关系以及它们的神经生物学基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验