Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍中的注意显著度与反应抑制的神经基础。

Attentional salience and the neural substrates of response inhibition in borderline personality disorder.

作者信息

Wrege J S, Carcone D, Lee A C H, Cane C, Lang U E, Borgwardt S, Walter M, Ruocco A C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Clinics of Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Strasse 27, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 16;52(15):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000118.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impulsivity is a central symptom of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and its neural basis may be instantiated in a frontoparietal network involved in response inhibition. However, research has yet to determine whether neural activation differences in BPD associated with response inhibition are attributed to attentional saliency, which is subserved by a partially overlapping network of brain regions.

METHODS

Patients with BPD (n = 45) and 29 healthy controls (HCs; n = 29) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while completing a novel go/no-go task with infrequent odd-ball trials to control for attentional saliency. Contrasts reflecting a combination of response inhibition and attentional saliency (no-go > go), saliency processing alone (oddball > go), and response inhibition controlling for attentional saliency (no-go > oddball) were compared between BPD and HC.

RESULTS

Compared to HC, BPD showed less activation in the combined no-go > go contrast in the right posterior inferior and middle-frontal gyri, and less activation for oddball > go in left-hemispheric inferior frontal junction, frontal pole, superior parietal lobe, and supramarginal gyri. Crucially, BPD and HC showed no activation differences for the no-go > oddball contrast. In BPD, higher vlPFC activation for no-go > go was correlated with greater self-rated BPD symptoms, whereas lower vlPFC activation for oddball > go was associated with greater self-rated attentional impulsivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BPD show frontoparietal disruptions related to the combination of response inhibition and attentional saliency or saliency alone, but no specific response inhibition neural activation difference when attentional saliency is controlled. The findings suggest a neural dysfunction in BPD underlying attention to salient or infrequent stimuli, which is supported by a negative correlation with self-rated impulsiveness.

摘要

背景

冲动是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的核心症状,其神经基础可能体现在参与反应抑制的额顶叶网络中。然而,研究尚未确定BPD中与反应抑制相关的神经激活差异是否归因于注意突显,而注意突显由部分重叠的脑区网络支持。

方法

45例BPD患者和29名健康对照者(HCs;n = 29)在完成一项新型的“停止信号”任务(包含不频繁的异常球试验以控制注意突显)时接受功能磁共振成像。比较BPD组和HC组之间反映反应抑制与注意突显组合(停止信号>执行信号)、单独的突显处理(异常球>执行信号)以及控制注意突显的反应抑制(停止信号>异常球)的对比。

结果

与HC相比,BPD在右侧后下和额中回的联合停止信号>执行信号对比中激活较少,在左侧额下回交界处、额极、顶上叶和缘上回的异常球>执行信号激活较少。至关重要的是,BPD和HC在停止信号>异常球对比中未显示激活差异。在BPD中,停止信号>执行信号时较高的腹侧前额叶皮质(vlPFC)激活与更高的BPD自评症状相关,而异常球>执行信号时较低的vlPFC激活与更高的自评注意冲动性相关。

结论

BPD患者在与反应抑制和注意突显组合或单独的注意突显相关的额顶叶存在功能障碍,但在控制注意突显时没有特定的反应抑制神经激活差异。研究结果表明BPD存在潜在的神经功能障碍,表现为对突显或不频繁刺激的关注,这得到了与自评冲动性负相关的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febe/9772916/9366bdc870cc/S0033291721000118_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验