Suppr超能文献

重新探讨在修订后的 FIGO 宫颈癌分期系统中,计算机断层扫描和膀胱镜检查在检测膀胱癌侵犯中的作用。

Revisiting the role of computerized tomographic scan and cystoscopy for detecting bladder invasion in the revised FIGO staging system for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):368-72. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d02d2d.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent revision of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for the cervix encourages use of computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging and does not recommend cystoscopy as a mandatory investigation. But the revision has not defined which patients should undergo cystoscopy. Our study aims to revisit the role of CT scan and cystoscopy for detecting bladder invasion so that we can select patients for cystoscopy.

METHODS

We reviewed case records of all cervical cancer patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT scan besides standard FIGO staging workup (including cystoscopy) and treatment with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy between years 2003 and 2005. Patients showing bladder invasion on CT scan or cystoscopy were identified and separately analyzed. Considering cystoscopy as the standard reference investigation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CT scan for bladder invasion were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 305 case records were analyzed. Median age of the patients was 50 years (range, 25-85 years). Forty-three (14%) patients had bladder invasion on CT scan, and 17 (5.5%) had cystoscopy-confirmed invasion. No patient showing absence of bladder invasion on CT scan showed cystoscopy-confirmed invasion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CT scan for bladder invasion were 100%, 92%, 40%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with CT-detected bladder invasion versus cystoscopy-confirmed invasion was 13 months versus 4 months, respectively (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that for cervical cancer, cystoscopy is not required in patients without any bladder invasion on CT scan. In the revised FIGO staging system, use of cystoscopy may be limited to patients having suspicious bladder invasion on CT scan. This will benefit both patient population and gynecologic oncologists, especially in developing countries with limited resources.

摘要

介绍

最近国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)修订了宫颈癌分期系统,鼓励使用计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像,并且不建议将膀胱镜检查作为强制性检查。但是,修订版并未定义哪些患者需要进行膀胱镜检查。我们的研究旨在重新评估 CT 扫描和膀胱镜检查在检测膀胱侵犯中的作用,以便选择需要进行膀胱镜检查的患者。

方法

我们回顾了 2003 年至 2005 年期间所有接受腹部盆腔 CT 扫描的宫颈癌患者的病历,这些患者除了进行标准的 FIGO 分期检查(包括膀胱镜检查)和接受放疗或同步放化疗治疗。我们识别出 CT 扫描或膀胱镜检查显示膀胱侵犯的患者,并分别进行分析。将膀胱镜检查作为标准参考检查,计算 CT 扫描对膀胱侵犯的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。

结果

共分析了 305 例病历。患者的中位年龄为 50 岁(范围,25-85 岁)。43 例(14%)患者在 CT 扫描中显示有膀胱侵犯,17 例(5.5%)患者在膀胱镜检查中显示有侵犯。在 CT 扫描中未显示膀胱侵犯的患者中,无一例在膀胱镜检查中显示有侵犯。CT 扫描对膀胱侵犯的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为 100%、92%、40%、100%和 92%。在 CT 扫描中检测到膀胱侵犯的患者与在膀胱镜检查中确诊为侵犯的患者的中位总生存时间分别为 13 个月和 4 个月,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.007)。

结论

我们的结果表明,对于宫颈癌,在 CT 扫描中未显示任何膀胱侵犯的患者无需进行膀胱镜检查。在修订后的 FIGO 分期系统中,膀胱镜检查可能仅限于 CT 扫描显示有可疑膀胱侵犯的患者。这将使患者群体和妇科肿瘤医生受益,特别是在资源有限的发展中国家。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验