Hershey Douglas A, Henkens Kene, Van Dalen Hendrik P
Department of Psycholoogy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;70(1):1-38. doi: 10.2190/AG.70.1.a.
Current theoretical models support the existence of interactions between the individual and socio-environmental forces when it comes to the formation and enactment of life plans (Friedman & Scholnick, 1997; Shanahan & Elder, 2002). In this investigation, we examine the social, economic, and psychological forces that impact financial planning for retirement. The collective force of these three broad sets of influences was examined from developmental and cross-cultural perspectives, among respondents from two countries with very different retirement financing systems. Participants were 419 American and 556 Dutch working adults, 25-64 years of age. Path analysis models were created to examine differences in planning associated with age and national origin. Compared to younger individuals, older respondents in both countries were more involved in nearly all aspects of the financial planning process. Differences across cultures were also observed in the social support mechanisms that underlie planning and the impact economic forces have on perceptions of saving adequacy. The discussion focuses on the value of developing interdisciplinary theoretical models of planning, and how such models can inform the development of savings-oriented intervention and public policy initiatives.
当前的理论模型支持在制定和实施生活计划时个人与社会环境力量之间存在相互作用(弗里德曼和肖尔尼克,1997年;沙纳汉和埃尔德,2002年)。在这项调查中,我们研究了影响退休财务规划的社会、经济和心理力量。从发展和跨文化的角度,在两个退休融资系统差异很大的国家的受访者中,考察了这三大类影响因素的综合作用。参与者为419名美国和556名荷兰在职成年人,年龄在25至64岁之间。创建路径分析模型以检验与年龄和国籍相关的规划差异。与年轻个体相比,两国的老年受访者几乎在财务规划过程的所有方面都更积极参与。在规划背后的社会支持机制以及经济力量对储蓄充足感认知的影响方面,也观察到了文化差异。讨论集中在开发跨学科规划理论模型的价值,以及此类模型如何为以储蓄为导向的干预措施和公共政策倡议的制定提供信息。