Suppr超能文献

中国肉类、蛋类和室内灰尘中的全氟化学品:评估全氟化学品人类暴露的来源和途径。

Perfluorochemicals in meat, eggs and indoor dust in China: assessment of sources and pathways of human exposure to perfluorochemicals.

机构信息

MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2010 May 1;44(9):3572-9. doi: 10.1021/es1000159.

Abstract

In this study, 10 perfluorochemicals (PFCs) were measured in meat, meat products, and eggs, and in indoor dust, collected in China. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were the most frequently detected PFCs in these samples. Mean concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in foodstuffs were in the range of 0.05-1.99 ng/g fresh wt and 0.06-12.5 ng/g fresh wt, respectively. The mean concentrations of PFOA, perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), and PFOS in indoor dust were 205, 14.0, and 4.86 ng/g, dry wt, respectively. The estimated daily intake of PFOS and PFOA from meat, meat products and eggs (EDI(meat&eggs)) ranged from 6.00 to 9.64 ng/d and from 254 to 576 ng/d, respectively, when the values below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were assigned as 0, and from 8.80 to 15.0 ng/d and from 255 to 577 ng/d, respectively, when the values below the LOQ were set at 1/2LOQ. The EDI(meat&eggs) of PFOS and PFOA increased with increasing family income. The estimated daily intake of PFOS and PFOA through inhalation of dust (EDI(dust)) ranged from 0.23 to 0.31 ng/d and from 9.68 to 13.4 ng/d, respectively. The daily intakes of PFOS and PFOA from the consumption of meat, meat products, and eggs, and from dust ingestion, as calculated from our samples in this study, were compared with estimated daily intake of PFCs reported from the concentrations in drinking water, fish and seafood from China. Our calculations indicate that dietary sources (EDI(dietary)) account for the overwhelming proportion of (>99% for PFOS and 98% for PFOA) total daily intake (TDI) in adults. The analyzed foodstuffs (meat, meat products, and eggs) were not the major contributors to dietary exposure to PFOS, whereas, meat was the primary contributor to dietary exposure to PFOA.

摘要

本研究在中国采集了肉类、肉类制品和蛋类样本以及室内灰尘样本,共检测了 10 种全氟化合物(PFCs)。在这些样本中,最常检测到的 PFCs 是全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)。食品中 PFOS 和 PFOA 的平均浓度范围分别为 0.05-1.99ng/g 鲜重和 0.06-12.5ng/g 鲜重。室内灰尘中 PFOA、全氟庚酸(PFHpA)和 PFOS 的平均浓度分别为 205、14.0 和 4.86ng/g 干重。当低于定量下限(LOQ)的值被赋值为 0 时,从肉类、肉类制品和蛋类中摄入的 PFOS 和 PFOA 的估计每日摄入量(EDI(肉和蛋))范围为 6.00 至 9.64ng/d 和 254 至 576ng/d,当低于 LOQ 的值设定为 1/2LOQ 时,分别为 8.80 至 15.0ng/d 和 255 至 577ng/d。PFOS 和 PFOA 的 EDI(肉和蛋)随家庭收入的增加而增加。通过吸入灰尘摄入的 PFOS 和 PFOA 的估计每日摄入量(EDI(灰尘))范围分别为 0.23 至 0.31ng/d 和 9.68 至 13.4ng/d。与中国饮用水、鱼类和海鲜中 PFC 浓度报告的估计每日摄入量相比,从本研究中的样本计算得出,PFOS 和 PFOA 的每日摄入量来自肉类、肉类制品和蛋类的消费以及灰尘摄入。我们的计算表明,饮食来源(EDI(饮食))占成年人总每日摄入量(TDI)的绝大部分(>99% 为 PFOS,98% 为 PFOA)。分析的食品(肉类、肉类制品和蛋类)并不是 PFOS 膳食暴露的主要来源,而肉类是 PFOA 膳食暴露的主要来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验