University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65 Suppl 1:38-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06202.x.
Despite recent advances in analgesia delivery techniques and the availability of new analgesic agents with favourable pharmacokinetic profiles, current evidence suggests that postoperative pain continues to be inadequately managed, with the proportion of patients reporting severe or extreme postoperative pain having changed little over the past decade. Regional techniques are superior to systemic opioid agents with regards to analgesia profile and adverse effects in the context of general, thoracic, gynaecological, orthopaedic and laparoscopic surgery. Outcome studies demonstrate that regional analgesic techniques also reduce multisystem co-morbidity and mortality following major surgery in high risk patients. This review will discuss the efficacy of regional anaesthetic techniques for acute postoperative analgesia, the impact of regional block techniques on physiological outcomes, and the implications of acute peri-operative regional anaesthesia on chronic (persistent) postoperative pain.
尽管在镇痛输送技术方面取得了新的进展,并且出现了具有有利药代动力学特征的新型镇痛药物,但目前的证据表明,术后疼痛仍然得不到充分控制,在过去十年中,报告严重或极度术后疼痛的患者比例几乎没有变化。在全身、胸部、妇科、骨科和腹腔镜手术中,区域技术在镇痛效果和不良反应方面优于全身阿片类药物。结果研究表明,区域镇痛技术还可降低高危患者大手术后多系统合并症和死亡率。本文将讨论区域麻醉技术在急性术后镇痛中的疗效,区域阻滞技术对生理结果的影响,以及急性围手术期区域麻醉对慢性(持续性)术后疼痛的影响。