Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK.
Implement Sci. 2010 Apr 8;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-25.
Psychological models are used to understand and predict behaviour in a wide range of settings, but have not been consistently applied to health professional behaviours, and the contribution of differing theories is not clear. This study explored the usefulness of a range of models to predict an evidence-based behaviour -- the placing of fissure sealants.
Measures were collected by postal questionnaire from a random sample of general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Scotland. Outcomes were behavioural simulation (scenario decision-making), and behavioural intention. Predictor variables were from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), Common Sense Self-regulation Model (CS-SRM), Operant Learning Theory (OLT), Implementation Intention (II), Stage Model, and knowledge (a non-theoretical construct). Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the predictive value of each theoretical model individually. Significant constructs from all theories were then entered into a 'cross theory' stepwise regression analysis to investigate their combined predictive value.
Behavioural simulation - theory level variance explained was: TPB 31%; SCT 29%; II 7%; OLT 30%. Neither CS-SRM nor stage explained significant variance. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT), timeline acute (CS-SRM), and outcome expectancy (SCT) entered the equation, together explaining 38% of the variance. Behavioural intention - theory level variance explained was: TPB 30%; SCT 24%; OLT 58%, CS-SRM 27%. GDPs in the action stage had significantly higher intention to place fissure sealants. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT) and attitude (TPB) entered the equation, together explaining 68% of the variance in intention.
The study provides evidence that psychological models can be useful in understanding and predicting clinical behaviour. Taking a theory-based approach enables the creation of a replicable methodology for identifying factors that may predict clinical behaviour and so provide possible targets for knowledge translation interventions. Results suggest that more evidence-based behaviour may be achieved by influencing beliefs about the positive outcomes of placing fissure sealants and building a habit of placing them as part of patient management. However a number of conceptual and methodological challenges remain.
心理模型被广泛用于理解和预测各种环境下的行为,但尚未一致应用于卫生专业人员的行为,并且不同理论的贡献也不明确。本研究探讨了一系列模型在预测基于证据的行为(放置窝沟封闭剂)方面的有用性。
通过邮寄问卷从苏格兰的普通牙医(GDP)中随机抽取样本收集测量结果。结果是行为模拟(情景决策)和行为意向。预测变量来自计划行为理论(TPB)、社会认知理论(SCT)、常识自我调节模型(CS-SRM)、操作性学习理论(OLT)、实施意图(II)、阶段模型和知识(非理论构建)。多元回归分析用于单独检查每个理论模型的预测价值。然后,将所有理论的显著构念纳入“跨理论”逐步回归分析,以研究它们的综合预测价值。
行为模拟-理论水平方差解释为:TPB 31%;SCT 29%;II 7%;OLT 30%。CS-SRM 和阶段都没有解释显著的方差。在跨理论分析中,习惯(OLT)、时间急性(CS-SRM)和结果期望(SCT)进入方程,共同解释了 38%的方差。行为意向-理论水平方差解释为:TPB 30%;SCT 24%;OLT 58%,CS-SRM 27%。处于行动阶段的 GDP 对放置窝沟封闭剂的意向明显更高。在跨理论分析中,习惯(OLT)和态度(TPB)进入方程,共同解释了意图方差的 68%。
该研究提供了证据表明,心理模型在理解和预测临床行为方面可能是有用的。采用基于理论的方法,可以为识别可能预测临床行为的因素创建可复制的方法,并为知识转化干预措施提供可能的目标。结果表明,通过影响对放置窝沟封闭剂的积极结果的信念并养成将其作为患者管理一部分的习惯,可以实现更多基于证据的行为。然而,仍存在一些概念和方法学挑战。