Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital Zuerich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Jun;152(6):965-72. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0643-4. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
Assess optimal equation to noninvasively estimate intracranial pressure (eICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (eCPP) following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) using transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCDS).
This is an observational clinical study in a university hospital.
A total of 45 continuously sedated (BIS < 50), normoventilated (paCO(2) > 35 mmHg), and non-febrile TBI patients.
eICP and eCPP based on TCCDS-derived flow velocities and arterial blood pressure values using three different equations were compared to actually measured ICP and CPP in severe TBI patients subjected to standard treatment. Optimal equation was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis.
The equations: ICP = 10:927 x PI(pulsatility index) - 1:284 and CPP = 89:646 - 8:258 PI resulted in eICP and eCPP similar to actually measured ICP and CPP with eICP 10.6 +/- 4.8 vs. ICP 10.3 +/- 2.8 and eCPP 81.1 +/- 7.9 vs. CPP 80.9 +/- 2.1 mmHg, respectively. The other two equations, eCPP = (MABP x EDV)/mFV + 14 and eCPP = mFV / (mFV - EDV)] x (MABP - RRdiast), resulted in significantly decreased eCPP values: 72.9 +/- 10.1 and 67 +/- 19.5 mmHg, respectively. Superiority of the first equation was confirmed by Bland-Altman revealing a smallest standard deviations for eCPP and eICP.
TCCDS-based equation (ICP = 10.927 x PI - 1.284) allows to screen patients at risk of increased ICP and decreased CPP. However, adequate therapeutic interventions need to be based on continuously determined ICP and CPP values.
使用经颅彩色双功能超声(TCCD)评估严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后无创性估计颅内压(ICP)和脑灌注压(CPP)的最佳方程。
这是一项在大学医院进行的观察性临床研究。
共纳入 45 例持续镇静(BIS < 50)、通气正常(PaCO2 > 35mmHg)且非发热的 TBI 患者。
使用三种不同的方程,基于 TCCD 衍生的血流速度和动脉血压值来比较严重 TBI 患者的 ICP 和 CPP 与实际测量值。通过 Bland-Altman 分析评估最佳方程。
方程 ICP = 10:927 x PI(搏动指数)-1:284 和 CPP = 89:646 - 8:258 PI 得出的 eICP 和 eCPP 与实际测量的 ICP 和 CPP 相似,eICP 为 10.6 +/- 4.8 vs. ICP 为 10.3 +/- 2.8,eCPP 为 81.1 +/- 7.9 vs. CPP 为 80.9 +/- 2.1mmHg。另外两个方程,eCPP = (MABP x EDV)/mFV + 14 和 eCPP = mFV / (mFV - EDV)] x (MABP - RRdiast),得出的 eCPP 值明显降低:分别为 72.9 +/- 10.1 和 67 +/- 19.5mmHg。Bland-Altman 显示,第一个方程的 eCPP 和 eICP 具有最小的标准偏差,证实了其优越性。
基于 TCCD 的方程(ICP = 10.927 x PI - 1.284)可用于筛查颅内压升高和 CPP 降低风险的患者。然而,适当的治疗干预需要基于连续测定的 ICP 和 CPP 值。