School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA.
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):73-84. doi: 10.1890/08-1821.1.
Terrestrial systems are thought to be organized predominantly from the bottom-up, but there is a growing literature documenting top-down trophic cascades under certain ecological conditions. We conducted an experiment to examine how arthropod community structure on a foundation riparian tree mediates the ability of insectivorous birds to influence tree growth. We built whole-tree bird exclosures around 35 mature cottonwood (Populus spp.) trees at two sites in northern Utah, USA, to measure the effect of bird predation on arthropod herbivore and predator species richness, abundance, and biomass, and on tree performance. We maintained bird exclosures over two growing seasons and conducted nondestructive arthropod surveys that recorded 63652 arthropods of 689 morphospecies representing 19 orders. Five major patterns emerged: (1) We found a significant trophic cascade (18% reduction in trunk growth when birds were excluded) only at one site in one year. (2) The significant trophic cascade was associated with higher precipitation, tree growth, and arthropod abundance, richness, and biomass than other site-year combinations. (3) The trophic cascade was weak or not evident when tree growth and insect populations were low apparently due to drought. (4) Concurrent with the stronger trophic cascade, bird predation significantly reduced total arthropod abundance, richness, and biomass. Arthropod biomass was 67% greater on trees without bird predation. This pattern was driven largely by two herbivore groups (folivores and non-aphid sap-feeders) suggesting that birds targeted these groups. (5) Three species of folivores (Orthoptera: Melanoplus spp.) were strong links between birds and trees and were only present in the site and the year in which the stronger trophic cascade occurred. Our results suggest that this trophic system is predominately bottom-up driven, but under certain conditions the influence of top predators can stimulate whole tree growth. When the most limiting factor for tree growth switched from water availability to herbivory, the avian predators gained the potential to reduce herbivory. This potential could be realized when strong links between the birds and plant, i.e., species that were both abundant herbivores and preferred prey, were present.
陆地系统被认为主要是自下而上组织的,但越来越多的文献记录了在某些生态条件下,自上而下的营养级联。我们进行了一项实验,以检验节肢动物群落结构对食虫鸟类影响树木生长的能力。我们在美国犹他州北部的两个地点,在 35 棵成熟的棉白杨(Populus spp.)周围建造了整树鸟类围栏,以测量鸟类捕食对节肢动物食草动物和捕食者物种丰富度、丰度和生物量以及树木生长的影响。我们在两个生长季节内维持鸟类围栏,并进行了非破坏性的节肢动物调查,记录了 63652 只节肢动物,代表 19 个目,有 689 个形态种。有五个主要模式出现:(1)我们仅在一个地点的一年中发现了一个显著的营养级联(当鸟类被排除时,树干生长减少了 18%)。(2)与其他地点-年份组合相比,显著的营养级联与较高的降水、树木生长和节肢动物丰度、丰富度和生物量有关。(3)当树木生长和昆虫数量因干旱而较低时,营养级联较弱或不明显。(4)与较强的营养级联同时发生的是,鸟类捕食显著降低了总节肢动物的丰度、丰富度和生物量。没有鸟类捕食的树木上的节肢动物生物量增加了 67%。这种模式主要是由两个食草动物群(直翅目:Melanoplus spp.)驱动的,表明鸟类针对这些群体。(5)三种食叶动物(直翅目:Melanoplus spp.)是鸟类和树木之间的强联系,仅存在于发生较强营养级联的地点和年份。我们的结果表明,这个营养系统主要是由底部向上驱动的,但在某些条件下,顶级捕食者的影响可以刺激整棵树的生长。当树木生长最受限制的因素从水分可利用性转变为食草作用时,鸟类捕食者就有可能减少食草作用。当鸟类和植物之间存在强联系时,即两者都是丰富的食草动物和首选猎物时,这种潜力就可以实现。