• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性腹部创伤:当前的处理方法

Blunt abdominal trauma: current management.

作者信息

D'Errico Emanuele, Goffre Beatrice, Mazza Davide

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, CH Toulon-La Seyne, France.

出版信息

Chir Ital. 2009 Sep-Dec;61(5-6):601-6.

PMID:20380265
Abstract

Management of blunt abdominal trauma has evolved over the last decade and non-operative management (NOM), initially viewed with scepticism, has now become widely used. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the results of liberal utilisation of NOM of blunt abdominal trauma. For that purpose we examined the charts of 119 patients admitted to our Department of Surgery from January 1998 to July 2006 for blunt abdominal trauma. NOM was opted for in cases of haemodynamic stability. When surgery was mandatory, it consisted in exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy. Six of the NOM patients (7%) needed surgical exploration during the 24 hours following the trauma. Thus, the success rate for NOM was 93%. Mean length of hospital stay was 12.5 days (range: 2-78); for emergency surgery patients it was 17 days (range: 2-78), and for NOM patients 14.5 days (range: 2-45). In conclusion, NOM may be safely used in cases of blunt abdominal trauma. Haemodynamic instability, suspicion of hollow viscus perforation and multiple transfusions are contraindications to this approach.

摘要

在过去十年中,钝性腹部创伤的处理方法不断演变,非手术治疗(NOM)最初受到质疑,如今已被广泛应用。这项回顾性研究的目的是探讨钝性腹部创伤广泛采用非手术治疗的结果。为此,我们查阅了1998年1月至2006年7月间因钝性腹部创伤入住我院外科的119例患者的病历。对于血流动力学稳定的病例选择非手术治疗。若必须进行手术,则采用剖腹探查术或腹腔镜检查。6例非手术治疗患者(7%)在创伤后24小时内需要进行手术探查。因此,非手术治疗的成功率为93%。平均住院时间为12.5天(范围:2 - 78天);急诊手术患者为17天(范围:2 - 78天),非手术治疗患者为14.5天(范围:2 - 45天)。总之,钝性腹部创伤病例可安全采用非手术治疗。血流动力学不稳定、怀疑中空脏器穿孔和多次输血是这种治疗方法的禁忌证。

相似文献

1
Blunt abdominal trauma: current management.钝性腹部创伤:当前的处理方法
Chir Ital. 2009 Sep-Dec;61(5-6):601-6.
2
Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内多个实性器官损伤的非手术治疗
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):943-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180342023.
3
[The comparison of the results of the conservative treatment between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal trauma between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal trauma].钝性腹部创伤后孤立性实体器官损伤与合并腹部外损伤的实体器官损伤保守治疗结果的比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003 Jan;9(1):23-9.
4
A diagnostic delay of 5 hours increases the risk of death after blunt hollow viscus injury.钝性中空脏器损伤后诊断延迟5小时会增加死亡风险。
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):84-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181db37f5.
5
[Penetrating abdominal trauma: 20 years experience in a Western European Trauma Center].[穿透性腹部创伤:西欧创伤中心20年经验]
Ann Ital Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):399-407.
6
[The importance of laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma].[腹腔镜检查在钝性腹部创伤中的重要性]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Jun;127(6):533-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32620.
7
Pediatric blunt abdominal injury: age is irrelevant and delayed operation is not detrimental.小儿钝性腹部损伤:年龄无关紧要,延迟手术并无坏处。
J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):608-14. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d2c2.
8
Predictive factors of operative or nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma.钝性肝外伤手术或非手术治疗的预测因素。
Minerva Chir. 2008 Jun;63(3):223-8.
9
Pediatric pancreatic trauma: predictors of nonoperative management failure and associated outcomes.小儿胰腺创伤:非手术治疗失败的预测因素及相关结局
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb;42(2):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.006.
10
Non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma in children: a fifteen-year experience.儿童钝性腹部创伤所致孤立性实体器官损伤的非手术治疗:十五年经验
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;14(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815777.

引用本文的文献

1
Perihepatic Packing versus Primary Surgical Repair in Patients with Blunt Liver Trauma; an 8-year Experience.钝性肝外伤患者肝周填塞与一期手术修复:八年经验
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2014 Jul;2(3):103-9.