Suppr超能文献

手部小手术后疼痛强度和残疾的预测因素。

Predictors of pain intensity and disability after minor hand surgery.

作者信息

Vranceanu Ana-Maria, Jupiter Jesse B, Mudgal Chaitanya S, Ring David

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):956-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between coping mechanisms and depression measured before surgery, and pain intensity and disability after surgery, as assessed at the time of suture removal.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients (39 electing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome, 65 for trigger finger, and 16 for a benign tumor) completed questionnaires measuring depression, pain self-efficacy (confidence that one can perform various activities despite pain), pain anxiety (fear and anxiety in response to pain sensations), and pain catastrophizing (maladaptive cognitive activities such as pain-related rumination, magnification, and helplessness) before surgery. Before the surgery and at the time of suture removal (10 to 14 days after surgery) participants completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and a numerical pain intensity rating scale.

RESULTS

At the time of suture removal, there was a significant correlation between pain intensity and depression (r = 0.45, p<.001), pain catastrophizing (r = 0.41, p<.001), pain anxiety (r = 0.32, p<.01), and self-efficacy (r = -0.29, p<.01). Disability correlated with self-efficacy (r = -0.34; p<.001) and depression (r = 0.49; p<.001), but not with pain anxiety and catastrophizing (p>.05). In multivariate analyses, depression was the sole predictor of both disability and pain intensity and accounted for 26% of the variance in DASH scores and 25% of the variance in pain intensity, after removing the influence of preoperative DASH and diagnosis, which accounted for 14% variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial factors, especially depression, explain a notable proportion of the variation in pain intensity and disability after minor hand surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic I.

摘要

目的

检验零假设,即手术前测量的应对机制与抑郁之间、以及拆线时评估的手术后疼痛强度和残疾程度之间不存在关联。

方法

总共120例患者(39例因腕管综合征选择手术,65例因扳机指,16例因良性肿瘤)在手术前完成了测量抑郁、疼痛自我效能感(尽管疼痛仍能进行各种活动的信心)、疼痛焦虑(对疼痛感觉的恐惧和焦虑)以及疼痛灾难化(如与疼痛相关的沉思、放大和无助等适应不良的认知活动)的问卷调查。在手术前以及拆线时(手术后10至14天),参与者完成了手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH)以及数字疼痛强度评分量表。

结果

在拆线时,疼痛强度与抑郁(r = 0.45,p <.001)、疼痛灾难化(r = 0.41,p <.001)、疼痛焦虑(r = 0.32,p <.01)以及自我效能感(r = -0.29,p <.01)之间存在显著相关性。残疾程度与自我效能感(r = -0.34;p <.001)和抑郁(r = 0.49;p <.001)相关,但与疼痛焦虑和疼痛灾难化无关(p >.05)。在多变量分析中,抑郁是残疾程度和疼痛强度的唯一预测因素,在去除术前DASH和诊断的影响(占方差的14%)后,抑郁分别解释了DASH评分方差的26%和疼痛强度方差的25%。

结论

社会心理因素,尤其是抑郁,在解释手部小手术后疼痛强度和残疾程度的变化中占显著比例。

研究类型/证据水平:预后性研究I级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验