Department of Pharmacology, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (DIPSAR), Pushp Vihar, Sector-3, New Delhi-110017, India.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Jul;31(4):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
The present study deals with transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) of Carvedilol (CRV) and Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). It compares the bioavailability of these two study drugs from a TDDS with conventional immediate release oral tablets in healthy volunteers. The TDDS was also evaluated for any adverse drug reaction. This was an open-label, randomised, single centre, two-treatment, two period, single dose, crossover pilot study of two formulations of cardiovascular agents. Subjects (n=10) were randomised to have a TDDS applied to their abdominal skin for 72h or receive one oral tablet each of CRV and HCTZ respectively in period I, followed by 1-week washout period. They received the alternative treatment in period II. A significant improvement in bioavailability was observed with the transdermal patches over oral tablets as observed by the mean AUC((0)(-)(t)) values 4004.37+/-180.98 and 1824.30+/-17.43ngh/mL respectively for CRV and HCTZ as compared to 753.46+/-53.34 and 392.89+/-34.23ngh/mL respectively, with the oral tablets. The TDDS possesses significant potential for skin irritation. The TDDS developed in our laboratory produced therapeutically effective plasma concentrations of the cardiovascular agents up to a range of 60 to 72h (in different volunteers with a mean=66h). It could be concluded from these observations that the TDDS meets the intended goal of at least 2day management of stage II hypertension with application of a single transdermal patch, hence improving patient compliance over the inconvenience seen with frequent oral administration.
本研究涉及卡维地洛(CRV)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的经皮给药系统(TDDS)。它比较了这两种研究药物从 TDDS 与健康志愿者常规即时释放口服片剂的生物利用度。还评估了 TDDS 是否有任何不良反应。这是一项开放标签、随机、单中心、两治疗、两周期、单剂量、交叉先导研究,研究了两种心血管药物制剂。受试者(n=10)随机接受 TDDS 贴剂贴于腹部皮肤 72h 或分别在第 I 期口服 CRV 和 HCTZ 各一片,随后进行 1 周洗脱期。他们在第 II 期接受替代治疗。与口服片剂相比,经皮贴片的生物利用度有显著改善,平均 AUC((0)(-)(t))值分别为 4004.37+/-180.98 和 1824.30+/-17.43ngh/mL,而 CRV 和 HCTZ 的口服片剂分别为 753.46+/-53.34 和 392.89+/-34.23ngh/mL。TDDS 具有明显的皮肤刺激潜力。我们实验室开发的 TDDS 产生了治疗有效浓度的心血管药物,达 60 至 72h 范围(在不同志愿者中平均为 66h)。从这些观察结果可以得出结论,TDDS 至少满足了 2 天管理 II 期高血压的目标,只需应用一片经皮贴片,从而提高了患者的依从性,减少了因频繁口服而带来的不便。