Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Division of Cariology and Endodontology, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, 1757 Tobetsu, Hokkaido 0610293, Japan.
Dent Mater. 2010 Jul;26(7):617-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
The purpose of this study was to compare the water sorption/solubility, percent conversion and microtensile bond strength of three single-step self-etching adhesives with those of a two-step self-etching primer adhesive system.
Solvent evaporation from the adhesives was determined gravimetrically. After removal of volatile solvents, the resins were cast into disks and polymerized. One-half of the disks were incubated in water while the other half were incubated in hexadecane. Repeated measurements of water sorption were made for 10 days followed by drying for 2.5 days to a constant weight. Percent conversion was done using FTIR spectroscopy. Microtensile bond strengths were measured 24h after bonding.
All of the adhesives lost 20-30% of their weight after 4 min of forced air except for Fluorobond II which lost no weight. All resins stored in water exhibited a time-dependent increase in water sorption and solubility. The resins stored in hexadecane showed very low sorption and solubility. Water sorption was highest for Absolute 2 (20.7%), intermediate for Fluorobond Shake One (10.2%) and lowest for Clearfil (3)S (8.9%) and Fluorobond II (7.5%). Percent conversions ranged from a low of 68.3% for Absolute 2 to a high of 87.4% for Clearfil (3)S. The two-step self-etching primer adhesive (Fluorobond II) gave the lowest water sorption and lowest solubility of any of the tested adhesives. SEM observations of resin disks incubated in hexadecane looked similar to unincubated controls. Incubating resin disks in artificial saliva covered the surfaces of the resins with mineral crystallites.
Single bottle self-etching adhesives show higher water sorption/solubilities than two-step self-etching adhesives. The former products would not be expected to function as well as the latter products.
本研究旨在比较三种一步自酸蚀粘结剂与两步自酸蚀底胶的吸水性/溶解度、转化率和微拉伸粘结强度。
通过称重法测定粘结剂的溶剂蒸发情况。挥发性溶剂去除后,将树脂浇铸到圆盘上并聚合。一半圆盘在水中孵育,另一半在十六烷中孵育。在 10 天内重复测量水吸收,然后干燥 2.5 天至恒重。使用 FTIR 光谱法进行转化率测定。粘结后 24 小时测量微拉伸粘结强度。
除氟硼粘结剂 II 外,所有粘结剂在强制空气下 4 分钟后均损失了 20-30%的重量。所有储存在水中的树脂均表现出随时间推移吸水和溶胀增加。储存在十六烷中的树脂吸水率和溶解度非常低。绝对 2(20.7%)的吸水率最高,氟硼粘结剂 Shake One(10.2%)次之,Clearfil(3)S(8.9%)和氟硼粘结剂 II(7.5%)最低。转化率范围从绝对 2 的低值 68.3%到 Clearfil(3)S 的高值 87.4%。两步自酸蚀底胶(氟硼粘结剂 II)的吸水率和溶解度最低。储存在十六烷中的树脂圆盘的 SEM 观察结果与未孵育的对照组相似。在人工唾液中孵育树脂圆盘会在树脂表面覆盖矿物质结晶。
单瓶自酸蚀粘结剂的吸水性/溶解度高于两步自酸蚀粘结剂。前者产品的性能不应优于后者。