Suppr超能文献

在一家教学医院开展旨在改善死亡证明开具情况的教育干预措施。

Educational intervention to improve death certification at a teaching hospital.

作者信息

Pandya Himanshu, Bose Neeta, Shah Ripal, Chaudhury Nayanjeet, Phatak Ajay

机构信息

Department of Medicine, H. M. Patel Centre for Medical Care and Education, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Natl Med J India. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):317-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information recorded in the 'cause of death' section of death certificates is an important source of mortality statistics. It is used for policy decisions, development of healthcare programmes and health research. Errors in death certificates can lead to inappropriate allocation of resources. Errors are universal and have been reported previously. We planned an educational intervention aimed at resident doctors from various specialties at our teaching hospital to improve the accuracy of the 'cause of death' section in death certificates.

METHODS

Three workshops, each of 90 minutes, were conducted for residents. A total of 198 death certificates (96 before and 102 after intervention) were audited. We compared the frequency of major and minor errors before and after the educational Intervention.

RESULTS

Following the educational intervention, there was a significant decrease in major errors such as unacceptable underlying cause of death (39.6% v. 24.5%, p = 0.034), reporting of mechanism without underlying cause of death (13.5% v. 1%, p = 0.001) and improper sequencing of events (25% v. 6%, p = 0.004). There was no significant decrease in minor errors such as absence of time intervals, use of abbreviations and reporting a mechanism with a legitimate cause.

CONCLUSION

Both major and minor errors are common in death certification at teaching hospitals. Educational interventions can improve the accuracy of reporting in death certificates.

摘要

背景

死亡证明“死因”部分记录的信息是死亡率统计的重要来源。它用于政策决策、医疗保健项目的制定以及健康研究。死亡证明中的错误可能导致资源分配不当。错误普遍存在,且此前已有报道。我们计划对我院各专业的住院医生进行教育干预,以提高死亡证明中“死因”部分的准确性。

方法

为住院医生举办了三场时长均为90分钟的研讨会。共审核了198份死亡证明(干预前96份,干预后102份)。我们比较了教育干预前后主要和次要错误的发生频率。

结果

经过教育干预后,主要错误显著减少,如不可接受的根本死因(39.6%对24.5%,p = 0.034)、报告了死亡机制但未提及根本死因(13.5%对1%,p = 0.001)以及事件顺序不当(25%对6%,p = 0.004)。次要错误如未填写时间间隔、使用缩写以及报告有合理死因的机制等,没有显著减少。

结论

教学医院死亡证明中的主要和次要错误都很常见。教育干预可以提高死亡证明报告的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验