• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高死亡率数据的准确性:.

Enhancing Mortality Data Accuracy: .

作者信息

Al-Busaidi Salim, Aly Eman, Al-Abri Mohammed, Al-Salmi Salim, Al-Hinai Abdullah, Al-Naqabi Omar, Al-Maskari Jawaher, Al-Mahroqi Marwa, Hashish Alaa, Doctor Henry, Rashidian Arash, Jabbour Jean, Al-Alawi Abdullah

机构信息

Oman Medical Specialty Board, Internal Medicine Training Program, Muscat, Oman.

Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, University Medical City, Muscat, Oman.

出版信息

Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):218-224. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2821.

DOI:10.18295/2075-0528.2821
PMID:40641730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12240160/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Mortality data is essential for global health policy and sustainable development goals, yet errors in death notifications, often exceeding 50%, challenge its accuracy. This is largely due to the lack of formal training among physicians and medical coders in issuing death notifications. This study conducting a national educational intervention and aimed to assess the outcomes of the intervention.

METHODS

A 2-day workshop was held in Oman in June 2023 for physicians and medical coders, employing a pre- and post-assessment design. The training, developed by both international and national experts, covered aspects of mortality data quality, based on the International Form of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death and validated by the World Health Organization. The curriculum focused on correctly defining and sequencing the causes of death and identifying common certification errors.

RESULTS

A total of 39 individuals, including doctors (59%) and medical coders (41%), participated in the workshop. A comparison of pre- and post-workshop assessments revealed significant enhancements in understanding mortality data. The doctors generally outperformed the coders in these improvements. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with approximately 80% strongly agreeing on the clarity and relevance of the content, as well as the engaging nature of activities and exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention significantly improved the quality of mortality data by enhancing the accuracy of death certifications. This success was achieved through a collaborative effort, highlighting the model's potential for future online modules to extend its reach. This study underscores the importance of structured training in enhancing the utility of mortality data, contributing to better health system evaluation and policy-making.

摘要

目标

死亡率数据对于全球卫生政策和可持续发展目标至关重要,但死亡通知中的错误常常超过50%,这对其准确性构成了挑战。这主要是由于医生和医学编码人员在发布死亡通知方面缺乏正规培训。本研究开展了一项全国性教育干预措施,并旨在评估该干预措施的效果。

方法

2023年6月在阿曼为医生和医学编码人员举办了为期两天的研讨会,采用前后评估设计。该培训由国际和国内专家共同制定,基于《国际死亡原因医学证明书》涵盖了死亡率数据质量的各个方面,并得到了世界卫生组织的认可。课程重点在于正确定义和排列死亡原因以及识别常见的认证错误。

结果

共有39人参加了研讨会,其中包括医生(59%)和医学编码人员(41%)。研讨会前后评估的比较显示,在对死亡率数据的理解方面有了显著提高。在这些改进方面,医生总体上表现优于编码人员。参与者的反馈绝大多数是积极的,约80%的人强烈认同内容的清晰度和相关性以及活动和练习的趣味性。

结论

该干预措施通过提高死亡证明的准确性,显著改善了死亡率数据的质量。这一成功是通过共同努力实现的,凸显了该模式在未来在线模块扩大其覆盖面方面的潜力。本研究强调了结构化培训在提高死亡率数据效用方面的重要性,有助于更好地进行卫生系统评估和政策制定。

相似文献

1
Enhancing Mortality Data Accuracy: .提高死亡率数据的准确性:.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):218-224. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2821.
2
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Enhancing Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation Skills: A Perceptual Learning Approach for Surgical Residents.增强术中胆管造影解读技能:一种针对外科住院医师的感知学习方法。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Sep;81(9):1267-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of death certification based on the documented underlying cause of death: A retrospective study.基于有记录的根本死因的死亡证明质量:一项回顾性研究。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2023 Jul;97:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2023.102547. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Factors Associated with Major Errors on Death Certificates.与死亡证明重大错误相关的因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;10(4):726. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040726.
3
The knowledge assessment and reducing the errors of medical certificate of cause of death with sensitization training of physicians: A quality improvement intervention study.通过医生的强化培训进行死因医学证明的知识评估与减少错误:一项质量改进干预研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jan 31;11:19. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_502_21. eCollection 2022.
4
Common errors in reporting cause-of-death statement on death certificates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.死亡证明中死因报告常见错误:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2021 Aug;82:102220. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102220. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Effectiveness of training interventions to improve quality of medical certification of cause of death: systematic review and meta-analysis.培训干预措施提高死亡原因医学证明质量的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 11;18(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01840-2.
6
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.全球、地区和国家按年龄、性别划分的 240 种死因的全死因和特定死因死亡率,1990-2013 年:2013 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
Systematic review of statistics on causes of deaths in hospitals: strengthening the evidence for policy-makers.医院死亡原因统计的系统评价:加强为政策制定者提供的证据
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Nov 1;92(11):807-16. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.137935. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Death certification practice in Qatar.卡塔尔的死亡证明实践。
Public Health. 2013 Sep;127(9):854-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
Educational intervention to improve death certification at a teaching hospital.在一家教学医院开展旨在改善死亡证明开具情况的教育干预措施。
Natl Med J India. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):317-9.
10
Teaching cause-of-death certification: lessons from international experience.教学死因认证:国际经验教训。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Mar;86(1013):143-52. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.089821.