• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.采用单野优化的强度调制质子治疗计划:监测单位约束对计划质量的影响。
Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1210-9. doi: 10.1118/1.3314073.
2
Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning.将可交付的剂量监测单位约束条件纳入调强质子治疗计划的点强度优化中。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Aug 7;58(15):5113-25. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/15/5113. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
3
TH-A-BRCD-01: Electron Radiotherapy: Past, Present, and Future.TH-A-BRCD-01:电子放射治疗:过去、现在与未来。
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part28):3979. doi: 10.1118/1.4736232.
4
Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.点大小和间距对稳健优化的肺癌调强质子治疗计划质量的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jun 1;101(2):479-489. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
5
Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.强度调制质子治疗脑和单侧头颈部肿瘤中的综合射束方向和扫描野优化。
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1338-1350. doi: 10.1002/mp.12788. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.最小监测单位阈值对笔形束扫描质子治疗计划质量的影响。
Med Phys. 2014 Sep;41(9):091703. doi: 10.1118/1.4892057.
7
Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.笔形束扫描质子治疗中靶点位置误差对计划质量和患者安全的影响
Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081706. doi: 10.1118/1.4885956.
8
Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.技术说明:用于高效笔形束扫描质子治疗的具有每层能量最小MU值(MMPEL)的计划交付时间受限逆优化方法
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):3892-3897. doi: 10.1002/mp.14363. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.铅笔束扫描治疗计划中斑点参数的影响。
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):60-73. doi: 10.1002/mp.12675. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
10
Independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated radiotherapy using the MIMiC multileaf collimator.使用MIMiC多叶准直器进行调强放射治疗的独立监测单元计算。
Med Phys. 2002 Sep;29(9):2041-51. doi: 10.1118/1.1500397.

引用本文的文献

1
An energy optimization method based on mixed-integer model and variational quantum computing algorithm for faster IMPT.一种基于混合整数模型和变分量子计算算法的能量优化方法,用于更快的调强质子治疗。
ArXiv. 2025 Apr 14:arXiv:2504.10315v1.
2
Multi-IMPT: a biologically equivalent approach to proton ARC therapy.多影像引导调强质子治疗:一种与质子弧形治疗生物学等效的方法。
ArXiv. 2024 Nov 26:arXiv:2411.17578v1.
3
TEAM: Triangular-mEsh Adaptive and Multiscale proton spot generation method.团队:三角形网格自适应和多尺度质子点生成方法。
Med Phys. 2024 Oct;51(10):7067-7079. doi: 10.1002/mp.17352. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
4
Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams.调强质子治疗中使用笔形束扫描质子束的最优最小 MU。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14435. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14435. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
5
Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization via dose modifying factor modeling for FLASH effective dose.通过剂量修正因子建模进行 FLASH 有效剂量的同时剂量和剂量率优化。
Med Phys. 2024 Aug;51(8):5190-5203. doi: 10.1002/mp.17251. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy.质子-光子混合放射治疗的生物学优化。
Phys Med Biol. 2024 May 30;69(11). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d51.
7
Impact of proton PBS machine operating parameters on the effectiveness of layer rescanning for interplay effect mitigation in lung SBRT treatment.质子 PBS 机操作参数对肺部 SBRT 治疗中减轻互作用效应的层重扫有效性的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jul;25(7):e14342. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14342. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
8
Probability of normal tissue complications for hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies using intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization.使用强优化的调强质子治疗妇科恶性肿瘤术后全盆腔放疗的血液学和胃肠道毒性的正常组织并发症概率。
J Radiat Res. 2024 May 23;65(3):369-378. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae008.
9
Optimizing linear energy transfer distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy using the alternating direction method of multipliers.使用乘子交替方向法优化调强质子治疗中的线性能量传递分布。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 28;14:1328147. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1328147. eCollection 2024.
10
A discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver for application to inverse planning of photons and protons.一种用于光子和质子逆向计划的离散坐标 Boltzmann 求解器。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Sep 13;68(18):185019. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf4de.

本文引用的文献

1
Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.在德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心质子治疗中心,对离散点扫描质子束传输系统进行调试。
Med Phys. 2010 Jan;37(1):154-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3259742.
2
Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors.前列腺癌的点扫描质子束治疗:旋转和平移对准误差的后果的治疗计划技术和分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Oct 1;78(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1696. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
3
The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.MD安德森质子治疗系统。
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4068-83. doi: 10.1118/1.3187229.
4
Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions.调强质子治疗及其对治疗不确定性的敏感性2:分次间和野间运动的潜在影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 21;53(4):1043-56. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/015. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
5
Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties.调强质子治疗及其对治疗不确定性的敏感性1:计算不确定性的潜在影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 21;53(4):1027-42. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/014. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
6
Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.下咽癌调强放射治疗中直接机器参数优化与采用顺序排序的射束通量优化的比较
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Sep 6;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-33.
7
Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment.解剖运动对前列腺癌治疗中质子治疗剂量分布的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 1;67(2):620-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.008.
8
Dosimetric comparison of four target alignment methods for prostate cancer radiotherapy.前列腺癌放射治疗中四种靶区对准方法的剂量学比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):883-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.044.
9
Treatment planning and verification of proton therapy using spot scanning: initial experiences.基于点扫描技术的质子治疗计划制定与验证:初步经验
Med Phys. 2004 Nov;31(11):3150-7. doi: 10.1118/1.1779371.
10
Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT.直接孔径优化:适用于步进式IMRT的交钥匙解决方案。
Med Phys. 2002 Jun;29(6):1007-18. doi: 10.1118/1.1477415.

采用单野优化的强度调制质子治疗计划:监测单位约束对计划质量的影响。

Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1210-9. doi: 10.1118/1.3314073.

DOI:10.1118/1.3314073
PMID:20384258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2837732/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of monitor unit (MU) constraints on the dose distribution created by intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using single-field optimization (SFO).

METHODS

Ninety-four energies between 72.5 and 221.8 MeV are available for scanning beam IMPT delivery at our institution. The minimum and maximum MUs for delivering each pencil beam (spot) are 0.005 and 0.04, respectively. These MU constraints are not considered during optimization by the treatment planning system; spots are converted to deliverable MUs during postprocessing. Treatment plans for delivering uniform doses to rectangular volumes with and without MU constraints were generated for different target doses, spot spacings, spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) widths, and ranges in a homogeneous phantom. Four prostate cancer patients were planned with and without MU constraints using different spot spacings. Rounding errors were analyzed using an in-house software tool.

RESULTS

From the phantom study, the authors have found that both the number of spots that have rounding errors and the magnitude of the distortion of the dose distribution from the ideally optimized distribution increases as the field dose, spot spacing, and range decrease and as the SOBP width increases. From our study of patient plans, it is clear that as the spot spacing decreases the rounding error increases, and the dose coverage of the target volume becomes unacceptable for very small spot spacings.

CONCLUSIONS

Constraints on deliverable MU for each spot could create a significant distortion from the ideally optimized dose distributions for IMPT fields using SFO. To eliminate this problem, the treatment planning system should incorporate the MU constraints in the optimization process and the delivery system should reliably delivery smaller minimum MUs.

摘要

目的

研究在使用单野优化(SFO)的强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)计划中,监视器单位(MU)限制对剂量分布的影响。

方法

在我们的机构中,可用于扫描束 IMPT 输送的能量为 72.5 至 221.8 MeV 之间的 94 种。每个铅笔束(点)的最小和最大 MU 分别为 0.005 和 0.04。在治疗计划系统的优化过程中不考虑这些 MU 限制;在后期处理中,将点转换为可输送的 MU。在均匀剂量输送到具有和不具有 MU 限制的矩形体积的情况下,为不同的靶剂量、点间距、扩展布拉格峰(SOBP)宽度和均匀体中的射程生成了治疗计划。使用不同的点间距,对 4 名前列腺癌患者进行了有和没有 MU 限制的计划。使用内部软件工具分析了舍入误差。

结果

从体模研究中,作者发现,具有舍入误差的点的数量以及剂量分布从理想优化分布的失真程度都随着场剂量、点间距、射程减小以及 SOBP 宽度增加而增加。从我们对患者计划的研究中可以清楚地看出,随着点间距的减小,舍入误差增加,并且对于非常小的点间距,靶体积的剂量覆盖变得不可接受。

结论

对于使用 SFO 的 IMPT 场,每个点的可输送 MU 限制可能会导致与理想优化剂量分布产生显著失真。为了消除这个问题,治疗计划系统应该在优化过程中包含 MU 限制,并且输送系统应该可靠地输送更小的最小 MU。