• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相关刺激与无关刺激在可关联性上的差异。

Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.

作者信息

Dopson Jemma C, Esber Guillem R, Pearce John M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):258-67. doi: 10.1037/a0016588.

DOI:10.1037/a0016588
PMID:20384405
Abstract

Pigeons in two experiments were first trained with a set of simple discriminations of the form AX+ CX-, BY+ DY- where A, B, C, and D were relevant, and belonged to one dimension, and X and Y were irrelevant and belonged to a different dimension. They were then tested with a discrimination of the form AX+ AY- BX-. The experiments revealed that the discrimination between AX+ and BX- was acquired more readily than between AX+ and AY-, which indicates that the original training resulted in the associability of the relevant stimuli being greater than that of the irrelevant stimuli. Experiment 2 revealed that the status of other stimuli from the two dimensions influenced these changes in associability. The associability of X and Y was enhanced by making other stimuli from the same dimension relevant, and the associability of A and B was reduced by making other stimuli from the same dimension irrelevant. The associability of the stimuli is attributed to the attention they are paid.

摘要

在两项实验中,首先对鸽子进行一组形式为AX+ CX-、BY+ DY-的简单辨别训练,其中A、B、C和D是相关的,且属于一个维度,而X和Y是不相关的,属于另一个维度。然后对它们进行AX+ AY- BX-形式的辨别测试。实验表明,AX+和BX-之间的辨别比AX+和AY-之间的辨别更容易习得,这表明最初的训练导致相关刺激的可联想性大于不相关刺激的可联想性。实验2表明,来自两个维度的其他刺激的状态影响了这些可联想性的变化。通过使来自同一维度的其他刺激相关,X和Y的可联想性得到增强,而通过使来自同一维度的其他刺激不相关,A和B的可联想性则降低。刺激的可联想性归因于它们所受到的关注。

相似文献

1
Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.相关刺激与无关刺激在可关联性上的差异。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):258-67. doi: 10.1037/a0016588.
2
Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.伴随负性模式[校正后]辨别出现的对无关线索注意力的变化。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):336-49. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0029-3.
3
Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.表明没有强化的刺激比无关刺激更受关注。
Learn Behav. 2010 Nov;38(4):337-47. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.4.337.
4
Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.鸽子刺激维度的整体性/可分性与多维泛化
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):194-205. doi: 10.1037/a0016560.
5
Superior discrimination between similar stimuli after simultaneous exposure.同时暴露后对相似刺激的卓越辨别能力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):18-25. doi: 10.1080/17470210802240614. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
6
Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.对模糊特征辨别能力的分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Nov;61(11):1710-25. doi: 10.1080/17470210701680746.
7
The discrimination of structure: III. Representation of spatial relationships.结构的辨别:III. 空间关系的表征
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):433-48. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.433.
8
Contextual control of attentional allocation in human discrimination learning.人类辨别学习中注意力分配的情境控制
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jan;39(1):56-66. doi: 10.1037/a0030599. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
Overshadowing and associability change.遮蔽与联想性变化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jul;37(3):287-99. doi: 10.1037/a0023140.
10
The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.使用来自三个不同维度的刺激对复杂负性模式辨别自动塑造的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2002 Oct;55(4):349-64. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000061.

引用本文的文献

1
Does learning history shape the associability of outcomes? Further tests of the outcome predictability effect.学习历史是否会影响结果的可联想性?结果可预测性效应的进一步检验。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0243434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243434. eCollection 2020.
2
Not-so-social learning strategies.不太社会化的学习策略。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1709.
3
The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.冗余线索的命运:对冗余效应的进一步分析。
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):72-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0162-x.
4
Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.人类偶然性学习中绝对和相对预测性的转移
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):32-43. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0159-5.
5
Attention as an acquisition and performance variable (AAPV).作为一种习得与表现变量的注意力(AAPV)。
Learn Behav. 2014 Jun;42(2):105-22. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0131-9.
6
The cost of selective attention in category learning: developmental differences between adults and infants.类别学习中选择性注意的成本:成人与婴儿之间的发展差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?关联学习中的注意力建模:是两个过程还是一个?
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):292-304. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0084-4.
8
Solving Pavlov's puzzle: attentional, associative, and flexible configural mechanisms in classical conditioning.解决巴甫洛夫的谜题:经典条件作用中的注意、联想和灵活的构型机制
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):269-91. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0083-5.
9
A configural theory of attention and associative learning.一种关于注意力和联想学习的构型理论。
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):241-54. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2.
10
Special issue on computational models of classical conditioning guest editors' introduction.经典条件作用计算模型特刊客座编辑引言
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):231-40. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0081-7.