Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂是否会影响室性心律失常风险患者的毫伏级 T 波电交替检测?一项荟萃分析。

Do Beta-blockers impact microvolt T-wave alternans testing in patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias? A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1009-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01757.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Results of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) studies vary and may be influenced by whether beta-blocker therapy was withheld prior to MTWA assessment. We conducted a meta-analysis of the predictive value of MTWA screening for ventricular arrhythmic events in primary prevention patients with left ventricular dysfunction and examined whether results differed depending upon whether beta-blocker use was withheld prior to MTWA testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective studies that evaluated whether MTWA predicted ventricular arrhythmic events published between January 1980 and September 2008 were identified. Summary estimates for the predictive value of MTWA were derived with random-effects models. Nine studies involving 3,939 patients were identified. Overall, an abnormal MTWA (positive and indeterminate) test was associated with an almost 2-fold increased risk for arrhythmic events (pooled RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.29-2.96; P = 0.002). However, significant heterogeneity across studies was observed (P = 0.024). In the 4 studies in which beta-blocker therapy was not withheld prior to MTWA assessment, an abnormal MTWA test was associated with a 5-fold increased risk for arrhythmic events (pooled RR = 5.39, 95% CI: 2.68-10.84; P < 0.001) and was robust to sensitivity analyses. In contrast, the association was much weaker in those studies where the use of beta-blocker therapy was withheld prior to MTWA testing (pooled RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.84; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In primary prevention patients with left ventricular dysfunction, the predictive power of MTWA varied widely, based on whether beta-blocker therapy was withheld prior to its assessment. This observation may explain the inconsistent results of MTWA studies in this population.

摘要

简介

微伏 T 波电交替(MTWA)研究的结果各不相同,可能受到在 MTWA 评估前是否停用β受体阻滞剂治疗的影响。我们对左心室功能障碍的一级预防患者中 MTWA 筛查对室性心律失常事件的预测价值进行了荟萃分析,并研究了在 MTWA 检测前是否使用β受体阻滞剂治疗对结果的影响。

方法和结果

确定了 1980 年 1 月至 2008 年 9 月间发表的评估 MTWA 是否预测室性心律失常事件的前瞻性研究。采用随机效应模型得出 MTWA 预测价值的综合估计值。确定了 9 项共涉及 3939 例患者的研究。总的来说,异常的 MTWA(阳性和不确定)试验与心律失常事件风险增加近 2 倍相关(汇总 RR=1.95,95%CI:1.29-2.96;P=0.002)。然而,研究间存在显著的异质性(P=0.024)。在 4 项未在 MTWA 评估前停用β受体阻滞剂治疗的研究中,异常的 MTWA 试验与心律失常事件风险增加 5 倍相关(汇总 RR=5.39,95%CI:2.68-10.84;P<0.001),且对敏感性分析稳健。相比之下,在那些在 MTWA 检测前停用β受体阻滞剂治疗的研究中,这种关联要弱得多(汇总 RR=1.40,95%CI:1.06-1.84;P=0.02)。

结论

在左心室功能障碍的一级预防患者中,MTWA 的预测能力差异很大,这取决于在评估 MTWA 之前是否停用β受体阻滞剂治疗。这种观察结果可能解释了 MTWA 研究在这一人群中的不一致结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验