在脑损伤患者评估中数字符号测试与非编码运动等效物之间的关系。

Relationships between the Digit Symbol test and a noncoding motoric equivalent in assessments of brain-damaged patients.

作者信息

LeFever F F

机构信息

Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY 10993.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Feb;72(1):65-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.1.65.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1991.72.1.65

PMID:2038535

Abstract

For 70 rehabilitation patients aged 17 to 85 yr. mean ratios of number of symbols coded to number copied were .48 for 10 persons (16 to 19 yr.) and .47 for 60 (20 to 69 yr.) which compares with .44 for normal subjects. Coding and copying are moderately correlated, and copying may be more sensitive to brain damage.

摘要

对于70名年龄在17至85岁的康复患者，10名16至19岁患者的编码符号数量与抄写符号数量的平均比率为0.48，60名20至69岁患者的该比率为0.47，而正常受试者的该比率为0.44。编码与抄写存在中度相关性，且抄写可能对脑损伤更为敏感。