Department of Neuroradiology, University Clinic, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Neuroradiology. 2011 Jan;53(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0691-8. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
The cervical spine is prone to artefacts in T2 MR-imaging due to patient movements and cerebrospinal fluid flow. The periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER/BLADE) acquisition method was developed to reduce motion artefacts. We sought to determine if T2-BLADE is superior to T2-TSE with conventional k-space reading.
Twenty-five patients were examined using a 1.5 T MR-scanner. T2-weighted imaging of the cervical spine in sagittal and axial orientation using conventional or BLADE k-space reading was performed. Spinal cord, subarachnoid space, vertebrae and discs were evaluated by two independent observers using a scale from 0 (non-diagnostic) to 3 (excellent). Interobserver correlation was assessed as Cohen's kappa. Results of Mann-Whitney U test with p < 0.05 were regarded as significant. Furthermore, the investigators were asked for subjective evaluation in consensus.
Overall interobserver accuracy of κ = 0.91 was obtained. Comparison of sagittal images showed better values for all investigated structures in T2-BLADE: spinal cord (TSE/BLADE: 1.52/2.04; p < 0.001), subarachnoid space (1.36/2.06; p < 0.001) and vertebrae/discs (1.66/2.86; p < 0.001). Comparison of axial images showed better values in T2-BLADE for spinal cord (1.68/1.86; p = 0.149) and vertebrae/discs (1.0/1.96: p < 0.001) while subarachnoid space was better to be evaluated in conventional T2-TSE (1.94/1.12; p < 0.001). In sagittal orientation, motion- and CSF-flow artefacts were reduced in T2-BLADE. In axial orientation, however, CSF-flow artefacts were pronounced in T2-BLADE.
The image quality of the sagittal T2-BLADE sequences was significantly better than the T2-TSE and acquired in less time. In axial orientation, increased CSF-flow artefacts may reduce accuracy of structures in the subarachnoid space.
颈椎在 T2 磁共振成像中容易出现伪影,这是由于患者的运动和脑脊液流动造成的。周期性旋转重叠平行线增强重建(PROPELLER/BLADE)采集方法的开发是为了减少运动伪影。我们试图确定 T2-BLADE 是否优于传统 k 空间读取的 T2-TSE。
25 例患者在 1.5 T 磁共振扫描仪上进行检查。使用常规或 BLADE k 空间读取方法对矢状位和轴位的颈椎进行 T2 加权成像。两位独立观察者使用 0(无法诊断)至 3(极佳)的评分对脊髓、蛛网膜下腔、椎体和椎间盘进行评估。采用 Cohen's kappa 评估观察者间的相关性。Mann-Whitney U 检验 p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。此外,研究者还被要求进行共识性的主观评估。
获得了观察者间整体准确性的 κ=0.91。矢状位图像的比较显示,在 T2-BLADE 中所有被研究结构的评估值都更好:脊髓(TSE/BLADE:1.52/2.04;p<0.001)、蛛网膜下腔(1.36/2.06;p<0.001)和椎体/椎间盘(1.66/2.86;p<0.001)。轴位图像的比较显示,T2-BLADE 中脊髓(1.68/1.86;p=0.149)和椎体/椎间盘(1.0/1.96:p<0.001)的评估值更好,而蛛网膜下腔在常规 T2-TSE 中更好(1.94/1.12;p<0.001)。在矢状位方向,T2-BLADE 减少了运动伪影和脑脊液流动伪影。然而,在轴位方向,T2-BLADE 中脑脊液流动伪影明显增加。
矢状位 T2-BLADE 序列的图像质量明显优于 T2-TSE,并且采集时间更短。在轴位方向,增加的脑脊液流动伪影可能会降低蛛网膜下腔结构的准确性。