Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Nov;45(13):2130-51. doi: 10.3109/10826081003713803. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
The recent interest in the psychopharmacological underpinnings of religious experiences has led to both the laboratory characterizations of drug-induced mystical events and psychobiological models of religious experiences rooted in evolution and fitness. Our examination of this literature suggests that these theories may be congruent only within more modern religious and cultural settings and are not generalizable to all historical beliefs, as would be expected from an evolutionarily conserved biological mechanism. The strong influence of culture on the subjective effects of drugs as well as religious thoughts argues against the concept of a common pathway in the brain uniquely responsible for these experiences. Rather, the role of personal beliefs, expectations and experiences may interject bias into the interpretation of psychoactive drug action as a reflection of biologically based religious thought. Thus, psychobiological research proposing specific brain mechanisms should consider anthropological and historical data to address alternative explanations to the "fitness" of religious thought. A psychobiological model of the religious experience based on the concept of cognitive unbinding seems to accommodate these data better than that of a specific brain locus of religion.
最近人们对宗教体验的精神药理学基础产生了兴趣,这导致了实验室中对药物诱导的神秘事件的描述,以及基于进化和适应性的宗教体验的心理生物学模型。我们对这些文献的研究表明,这些理论可能只在更现代的宗教和文化背景下是一致的,而不能推广到所有历史信仰,这与从进化上保守的生物机制中预期的情况不符。文化对药物和宗教思想的主观影响的强烈影响表明,大脑中不存在负责这些体验的共同途径。相反,个人信仰、期望和经验的作用可能会在解释精神活性药物作用时产生偏见,将其视为基于生物的宗教思想的反映。因此,提出特定大脑机制的心理生物学研究应该考虑人类学和历史数据,以解决“适应性”宗教思想的替代解释。基于认知解绑概念的宗教体验心理生物学模型似乎比基于宗教特定大脑位置的模型更能适应这些数据。