Le Brun Nick E, Crow Allister, Murphy Michael E P, Mauk A Grant, Moore Geoffrey R
Centre for Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, School of Chemistry, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Aug;1800(8):732-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Apr 11.
To satisfy their requirement for iron while at the same time countering the toxicity of this highly reactive metal ion, prokaryotes have evolved proteins belonging to two distinct sub-families of the ferritin family: the bacterioferritins (BFRs) and the bacterial ferritins (Ftns). Recently, Ftn homologues have also been identified and characterised in archaeon species. All of these prokaryotic ferritins function by solubilising and storing large amounts of iron in the form of a safe but bio-available mineral.
The mechanism(s) by which the iron mineral is formed by these proteins is the subject of much current interest. Here we review the available information on these proteins, with particular emphasis on significant advances resulting from recent structural, spectroscopic and kinetic studies.
Current understanding indicates that at least two distinct mechanisms are in operation in prokaryotic ferritins. In one, the ferroxidase centre acts as a true catalytic centre in driving Fe(2+) oxidation in the cavity; in the other, the centre acts as a gated iron pore by oxidising Fe(2+) and transferring the resulting Fe(3+) into the central cavity.
The prokaryotic ferritins exhibit a wide variation in mechanisms of iron core mineralisation. The basis of these differences lies, at least in part, in structural differences at and around the catalytic centre. However, it appears that more subtle differences must also be important in controlling the iron chemistry of these remarkable proteins.
为了满足对铁的需求,同时对抗这种高反应性金属离子的毒性,原核生物进化出了属于铁蛋白家族两个不同亚家族的蛋白质:细菌铁蛋白(BFRs)和细菌铁蛋白(Ftns)。最近,在古细菌物种中也鉴定并表征了铁蛋白同源物。所有这些原核铁蛋白的功能都是通过以一种安全但可生物利用的矿物质形式溶解和储存大量铁。
这些蛋白质形成铁矿物质的机制是当前备受关注的主题。在这里,我们综述了关于这些蛋白质的现有信息,特别强调了近期结构、光谱和动力学研究取得的重大进展。
目前的认识表明,原核铁蛋白中至少有两种不同的机制在起作用。在一种机制中,铁氧化酶中心在驱动腔内Fe(2+)氧化时充当真正的催化中心;在另一种机制中,该中心通过氧化Fe(2+)并将生成的Fe(3+)转移到中央腔中充当门控铁孔。
原核铁蛋白在铁芯矿化机制上表现出广泛的差异。这些差异的基础至少部分在于催化中心及其周围的结构差异。然而,似乎更细微的差异在控制这些非凡蛋白质的铁化学性质方面也一定很重要。