Hughes Claire, Ensor Rosie, Wilson Anji, Graham Andrew
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dev Neuropsychol. 2010;35(1):20-36. doi: 10.1080/87565640903325691.
This longitudinal study of executive function (EF) addressed three questions. These concerned: (i) the validity of EF as a latent construct underpinning performance at ages 4 and 6 on tests of planning, inhibitory control, and working memory; (ii) developmental change in EF across these time-points, which straddled children's transition to school; and (iii) verbal ability and family income as predictors of base-line individual differences and variation in the slopes of EF development. Confirmatory factor analyses of data from a socially diverse sample of 191 children supported the validity of a single EF construct at both time-points; a MIMIC (multiple indicators, multiple causes) model showed equally good fit for boys and girls. Latent growth models demonstrated that verbal mental age and family income predicted EF intercepts, but EF slopes were only related to verbal mental age. Across the transition to school, less able children (but not children from low income families) showed greater gains in EF than their peers.
这项关于执行功能(EF)的纵向研究探讨了三个问题。这些问题涉及:(i)EF作为一种潜在结构在4岁和6岁时对计划、抑制控制和工作记忆测试表现的支撑效度;(ii)在这些跨越儿童向学校过渡的时间点上EF的发展变化;以及(iii)语言能力和家庭收入作为基线个体差异和EF发展斜率变化的预测因素。对来自191名儿童的社会多样化样本数据进行的验证性因素分析支持了在两个时间点上单一EF结构的效度;一个多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型对男孩和女孩的拟合效果同样良好。潜在增长模型表明,语言心理年龄和家庭收入可预测EF截距,但EF斜率仅与语言心理年龄相关。在向学校过渡期间,能力较差的儿童(但不是来自低收入家庭的儿童)在EF方面比同龄人有更大的提升。