Suppr超能文献

大黄素、芦荟大黄素和rhein 诱导 SCC-4 人舌癌细胞 DNA 损伤并抑制 DNA 修复基因的表达。

Emodin, aloe-emodin and rhein induced DNA damage and inhibited DNA repair gene expression in SCC-4 human tongue cancer cells.

机构信息

China Medical University, No 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 404, Taiwan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2010 Mar;30(3):945-51.

Abstract

In our primary studies, we have shown that emodin, aloe-emodin and rhein induced cytotoxic effects, including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in SCC-4 human tongue cancer cells. However, details regarding their effects on DNA damage and repair gene expression in SCC-4 cells are not clear. We investigated whether or not emodin, aloe-emodin and rhein induced DNA damage and inhibited DNA repair gene expression in SCC-4 cells. Comet assay (single cell electrophoresis) indicated that incubation of SCC-4 cells with 0, 20, 30 and 40 microM of emodin, 0, 25, 50 and 100 microM of aloe-emodin or rhein led to a longer DNA migration smear (comet tail). This means that all examined agents induced DNA damage in SCC-4 cells and these effects are dose-dependent but emodin is stronger than that of aloe-emodin or rhein. The results from real-time PCR assay demonstrated that 30 microM of emodin or aloe-emodin used for 24 and 48 h treatment in SCC-4 cells significantly inhibited expression of genes associated with DNA damage and repair [ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM); ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR); 14-3-3sigma (14-3-3sigma); breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1); and DNA-dependent serine/threonine protein kinase (DNA-PK)]; only rhein suppressed the expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) mRNA with 48 h treatment, but had no effect on ATM expression. On 24 h treatment, only aloe-emodin significantly affected ATM expression. These effects may be the vital factors for emodin, aloe-emodin and rhein induction of DNA damage in vitro. In conclusion, these agents induced DNA damage followed by the inhibition of DNA repair-associated gene expressions, including ATM, ATR, 14-3-3sigma, BRCA1, DNA-PK and MGMT in SCC-4 human tongue cancer cells.

摘要

在我们的初步研究中,我们已经表明大黄素、芦荟大黄素和大黄酸在 SCC-4 人舌癌细胞中诱导细胞毒性作用,包括细胞周期停滞和细胞凋亡。然而,关于它们对 SCC-4 细胞中 DNA 损伤和修复基因表达的影响的细节尚不清楚。我们研究了大黄素、芦荟大黄素和大黄酸是否诱导 SCC-4 细胞中的 DNA 损伤并抑制 DNA 修复基因的表达。彗星试验(单细胞电泳)表明,用 0、20、30 和 40 μM 的大黄素、0、25、50 和 100 μM 的芦荟大黄素或大黄酸孵育 SCC-4 细胞会导致更长的 DNA 迁移拖尾(彗星尾)。这意味着所有被检查的药物在 SCC-4 细胞中诱导 DNA 损伤,并且这些作用是剂量依赖性的,但大黄素比芦荟大黄素或大黄酸更强。实时 PCR 检测结果表明,用 30 μM 的大黄素或芦荟大黄素处理 SCC-4 细胞 24 和 48 小时,显著抑制与 DNA 损伤和修复相关的基因的表达[共济失调毛细血管扩张突变(ATM);共济失调毛细血管扩张和 Rad3 相关(ATR);14-3-3sigma(14-3-3sigma);乳腺癌 1,早发(BRCA1);和 DNA 依赖性丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶(DNA-PK)];只有大黄酸在 48 小时处理时抑制 O(6)-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA 甲基转移酶(MGMT)mRNA 的表达,但对 ATM 表达没有影响。在 24 小时处理时,只有芦荟大黄素显著影响 ATM 表达。这些作用可能是大黄素、芦荟大黄素和大黄酸在体外诱导 DNA 损伤的重要因素。总之,这些药物在 SCC-4 人舌癌细胞中诱导 DNA 损伤,随后抑制 ATM、ATR、14-3-3sigma、BRCA1、DNA-PK 和 MGMT 等与 DNA 修复相关的基因表达。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验