Department of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
J Nucl Med. 2010 May;51(5):669-73. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.071712. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
Several authors reported the superiority of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT to conventional imaging (CI) for the assessment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, the detection of a higher number of lesions is not necessarily followed by a modification of disease stage or therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT on the clinical management of NET patients.
The study included 90 patients with pathologic confirmation of NET, CT performed within a month of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, and a follow-up period of at least 1 y. PET/CT results were compared with CI results. As a standard of reference to finally evaluate PET results, clinical and imaging follow-up data were used. To assess the clinical impact of PET findings, all referring physicians were contacted after PET and asked about how patients were managed. Stage or therapy modifications were independently recorded, and the overall impact was evaluated patient by patient if PET results either affected therapy or caused a change in disease stage.
Considering PET/CT and CI concordant cases (47/90 [52.2%]), PET findings affected the therapeutic management in 17 of 47 (36.2%) patients. Although PET did not result in modification of disease stage, (68)Ga-DOTANOC detected a higher lesion number in most patients. PET/CT and CI findings were discordant in 42 of 90 (46.7%) patients: PET resulted in a modification of stage in 12 patients (28.6%) and affected the treatment plan in 32 patients (76.2%). PET and CT were both equivocal in 1 patient (1/90). Considering all cases, (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT affected either stage or therapy in 50 of 90 (55.5%) patients. The most frequent impact on management (27 patients) was the initiation or continuance of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, followed by the initiation or continuance of somatostatin analog medical treatment (7 patients) and referral to surgery (6 patients). PET prevented unnecessary surgery in 6 patients and excluded from treatment with somatostatin analogs 2 patients with NET lesions that did not express somatostatin receptors. Less frequent impacts on management included the initiation of radiotherapy (1 patient), further diagnostic investigation (1 patient), and liver transplantation (1 patient).
(68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT either affected stage or caused a therapy modification in more than half the patients, thus confirming the clinical role of PET in the management of NET.
评估 (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT 对神经内分泌肿瘤 (NET) 患者临床管理的影响。
该研究纳入了 90 例经病理证实的 NET 患者,所有患者均在 (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT 检查前一个月内行 CT 检查,并随访至少 1 年。将 PET/CT 结果与 CI 结果进行比较。为了最终评估 PET 结果,使用临床和影像学随访数据作为参考标准。为了评估 PET 结果的临床影响,在 PET 检查后联系所有参考医师,询问患者的管理情况。如果 PET 结果影响治疗或导致疾病分期改变,则独立记录分期或治疗的改变,并对每个患者进行总体影响评估。
考虑到 PET/CT 和 CI 一致的病例(47/90 [52.2%]),PET 结果影响了 47 例中的 17 例(36.2%)患者的治疗管理。尽管 PET 未导致疾病分期改变,但 (68)Ga-DOTANOC 在大多数患者中检测到更多的病变数。90 例中有 42 例(46.7%)PET/CT 和 CI 结果不一致:12 例(28.6%)患者的分期改变,32 例(76.2%)患者的治疗计划改变。1 例(1/90)患者 PET 和 CT 均不确定。考虑所有病例,(68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT 改变了 90 例中的 50 例(55.5%)的分期或治疗。最常见的管理影响(27 例)是开始或继续肽受体放射性核素治疗,其次是开始或继续生长抑素类似物药物治疗(7 例)和转介手术(6 例)。PET 避免了 6 例患者的不必要手术,并排除了 2 例不表达生长抑素受体的 NET 病变患者接受生长抑素类似物治疗。对管理的影响较少包括开始放疗(1 例)、进一步诊断性检查(1 例)和肝移植(1 例)。
(68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT 改变了超过一半患者的分期或导致治疗改变,因此证实了 PET 在 NET 管理中的临床作用。