Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Clin Chem. 2010 Jun;56(6):912-20. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.140194. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
Free thyroxine (FT4) and free triiodothyronine (FT3) measurements are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of thyroid disorders. The IFCC Scientific Division established a Working Group to resolve issues of method performance to meet clinical requirements.
We compared results for measurement of a panel of single donor sera using clinical laboratory procedures based on equilibrium dialysis-isotope dilution-mass spectrometry (ED-ID-MS) (2 for FT4, 1 for FT3) and immunoassays from 9 manufacturers (15 for FT4, 13 for FT3) to a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure (cRMP) also based on ED-ID-MS.
For FT4 (FT3), the mean bias of 2 (4) assays was within 10% of the cRMP, whereas for 15 (9) assays, negative biases up to -42% (-30%) were seen; 1 FT3 assay was positively biased by +22%. Recalibration to the cRMP eliminated assay-specific biases; however, sample-related effects remained, as judged from difference plots with biologic total error limits. Correlation coefficients to the cRMPs ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 0.92 to 0.78 (0.88 to 0.30). Within-run and total imprecision ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 1.0% to 11.1% (1.8% to 9.4%) and 1.5% to 14.1% (2.4% to 10.0%), respectively. Approximately half of the manufacturers matched the internal QC targets within approximately 5%; however, within-run instability was observed.
The study showed that most assays had bias largely correctable by establishing calibration traceability to a cRMP and that the majority performed well. Some assays, however, would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.
游离甲状腺素(FT4)和游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(FT3)的测定在各种甲状腺疾病的诊断和治疗中都很有用。国际临床化学联合会科学分部成立了一个工作组,以解决方法性能问题,以满足临床要求。
我们比较了使用基于平衡透析-同位素稀释-质谱法(ED-ID-MS)的临床实验室程序(FT4 为 2 项,FT3 为 1 项)和 9 个制造商的免疫测定法(FT4 为 15 项,FT3 为 13 项)测量一组单一供体血清的结果,与也基于 ED-ID-MS 的候选国际常规参考测量程序(cRMP)进行比较。
对于 FT4(FT3),2(4)项测定的平均偏差在 cRMP 的 10%以内,而对于 15(9)项测定,负偏差高达-42%(-30%);1 项 FT3 测定呈正偏差,为+22%。重新校准至 cRMP 消除了测定特异性偏差;然而,从具有生物学总误差限的差异图判断,仍然存在与样本相关的效应。FT4(FT3)的相关系数范围为 0.92 至 0.78(0.88 至 0.30)。FT4(FT3)的批内和总不精密度范围分别为 1.0%至 11.1%(1.8%至 9.4%)和 1.5%至 14.1%(2.4%至 10.0%)。大约一半的制造商在大约 5%的范围内符合内部 QC 目标;然而,观察到批内不稳定性。
该研究表明,通过建立与 cRMP 的校准溯源性,大多数测定法的偏差基本可以得到纠正,而且大多数测定法都表现良好。然而,一些测定法将受益于提高精密度、批内稳定性和批间一致性。