Computational and Mathematical Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore 127726, Singapore.
BMC Genomics. 2010 Apr 16;11:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-242.
While new sequencing technologies have ushered in an era where microbial genomes can be easily sequenced, the goal of routinely producing high-quality draft and finished genomes in a cost-effective fashion has still remained elusive. Due to shorter read lengths and limitations in library construction protocols, shotgun sequencing and assembly based on these technologies often results in fragmented assemblies. Correspondingly, while draft assemblies can be obtained in days, finishing can take many months and hence the time and effort can only be justified for high-priority genomes and in large sequencing centers. In this work, we revisit this issue in light of our own experience in producing finished and nearly-finished genomes for a range of microbial species in a small-lab setting. These genomes were finished with surprisingly little investments in terms of time, computational effort and lab work, suggesting that the increased access to sequencing might also eventually lead to a greater proportion of finished genomes from small labs and genomics cores.
虽然新的测序技术开创了一个可以轻松测序微生物基因组的时代,但以经济有效的方式常规生成高质量草图和完成基因组的目标仍然难以实现。由于读长较短以及文库构建方案的限制,基于这些技术的鸟枪法测序和组装通常会导致组装片段化。相应地,虽然草图组装可以在数天内获得,但完成可能需要数月的时间,因此,只有在高优先级基因组和大型测序中心,才需要投入时间和精力。在这项工作中,我们根据自己在小型实验室中为一系列微生物物种生成完成和接近完成的基因组的经验,重新审视了这个问题。这些基因组的完成仅需要投入少量的时间、计算资源和实验室工作,这表明测序的机会增加,最终也可能会有更多来自小型实验室和基因组核心的完成基因组。