Yuan F, Baxter L T, Jain R K
Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890.
Cancer Res. 1991 Jun 15;51(12):3119-30.
Bifunctional antibodies (BFA) and enzyme-conjugated antibodies (ECA) can be used to preferentially deliver a hapten or drug to tumor sites for diagnosis and therapy. We present here a simple pharmacokinetic model for the above two systems by considering only two compartments, the plasma and tumor. The models predict that the longer the time delay between the BFA and hapten or between the ECA and prodrug injections, the higher the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the hapten or drug. In addition, multiple injections of the hapten or prodrug is predicted to give a more uniform concentration of the hapten or drug in both the tumor and plasma than bolus injection. We suggest that, initially, the most effective dose of BFA should be selected and then the hapten concentration chosen accordingly. The decrease of the ECA injection dose would increase the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the drug and yet decrease the tumor concentration of the drug. In clinical application of the ECA system, consideration of ECA dose should be balanced between the tumor concentration and the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the drug. The dose of the prodrug injection is suggested to be equal to the required toxic concentration of the drug in the tumor. There are several ways to improve the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the hapten or drug, such as changing the binding kinetics of the antibody to tumor or the hapten to BFA and removing the antibody from the plasma before the injection of the hapten or prodrug. One notable difference between the BFA and ECA approaches is that there is an upper limit for maximum hapten concentration in the former, and hence, from the point of drug delivery alone the latter approach is presumably superior. The limitations of the models and therapeutic implications are also discussed.
双功能抗体(BFA)和酶联抗体(ECA)可用于将半抗原或药物优先递送至肿瘤部位以进行诊断和治疗。我们在此提出一个针对上述两个系统的简单药代动力学模型,该模型仅考虑血浆和肿瘤两个隔室。模型预测,BFA与半抗原之间或ECA与前药注射之间的时间延迟越长,半抗原或药物的肿瘤:血浆浓度比就越高。此外,预测多次注射半抗原或前药比单次推注能使半抗原或药物在肿瘤和血浆中的浓度更均匀。我们建议,首先应选择最有效的BFA剂量,然后相应地选择半抗原浓度。降低ECA注射剂量会增加药物的肿瘤:血浆浓度比,但同时会降低药物在肿瘤中的浓度。在ECA系统的临床应用中,应在药物的肿瘤浓度和肿瘤:血浆浓度比之间平衡考虑ECA剂量。建议前药注射剂量等于肿瘤中药物所需的毒性浓度。有几种方法可以提高半抗原或药物的肿瘤:血浆浓度比,例如改变抗体与肿瘤的结合动力学或半抗原与BFA的结合动力学,以及在注射半抗原或前药之前从血浆中清除抗体。BFA和ECA方法之间一个显著的区别是,前者的最大半抗原浓度存在上限,因此,仅从药物递送的角度来看,后一种方法可能更具优势。还讨论了模型的局限性和治疗意义。