• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在繁忙的综合急诊科中,一个专门的儿科团队会对候诊时间、满意度及护理转接产生影响吗?

Does a dedicated pediatric team within a busy mixed emergency department make a difference in waiting times, satisfaction, and care transition?

作者信息

Keijzers Gerben, Crilly Julia, Walters Benjamin, Crawford Rosalind, Bell Christa

机构信息

Emergency Department, Gold Coast Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Apr;26(4):274-80. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e3181d6da2c.

DOI:10.1097/pec.0b013e3181d6da2c
PMID:20401972
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of a dedicated, free-floating, pediatric-targeted care delivery model on emergency department (ED) waiting times, parent satisfaction, and transition of care.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted between July 16 and August 12, 2007. It incorporated a before-and-after design with a 2-week preintervention and a 2-week intervention group. In the intervention period, the pediatric ED initiative (PEDI) team was introduced, which consisted of a free-floating doctor and nurse equipped to see pediatric patients. Consenting patients/parents were followed up by telephone 7 to 14 days after discharge regarding satisfaction and waiting times.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-three pediatric presentations (216 in the preintervention group and 237 in the intervention group) were analyzed, of which the PEDI team treated 81 pediatric patients during the intervention period. The intervention group had a significantly shorter length of stay in the ED (158 vs 194 minutes; P = 0.01). However, there was no difference in time to be seen by a doctor (80 vs 78 minutes; P = 0.54). Satisfaction of the total study group was significantly related to staff attitude and understanding of the wait.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated pediatric team that specifically sees and treats pediatric populations during times of peak ED workload can reduce total ED length of stay for pediatric presentations, but has no effect on waiting time to see a doctor. There was only a marginal impact of the PEDI team on both transition of care and satisfaction indicators. Waiting times, staff attitude, and patient education proved to be important determinants of overall satisfaction for the total study group.

摘要

目的

评估一种专门的、流动式的、针对儿科患者的护理模式对急诊科(ED)候诊时间、家长满意度及护理转接的影响。

方法

于2007年7月16日至8月12日进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。采用前后对照设计,有为期2周的干预前阶段和为期2周的干预组。在干预期,引入了儿科急诊科倡议(PEDI)团队,该团队由一名流动医生和一名护士组成,具备诊治儿科患者的能力。在患者/家长出院7至14天后通过电话随访其满意度和候诊时间。

结果

分析了453例儿科就诊病例(干预前组216例,干预组237例),其中PEDI团队在干预期诊治了81例儿科患者。干预组在急诊科的住院时间显著缩短(158分钟对194分钟;P = 0.01)。然而,看医生的等待时间并无差异(80分钟对78分钟;P = 0.54)。整个研究组的满意度与工作人员态度及对等待的理解显著相关。

结论

在急诊科工作量高峰时段专门诊治儿科患者的团队可缩短儿科就诊患者在急诊科的总住院时间,但对看医生的等待时间无影响。PEDI团队对护理转接和满意度指标仅有微弱影响。候诊时间、工作人员态度及患者教育被证明是整个研究组总体满意度的重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Does a dedicated pediatric team within a busy mixed emergency department make a difference in waiting times, satisfaction, and care transition?在繁忙的综合急诊科中,一个专门的儿科团队会对候诊时间、满意度及护理转接产生影响吗?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Apr;26(4):274-80. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e3181d6da2c.
2
Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay.医疗团队评估:对急诊科候诊时间和住院时间的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372. eCollection 2016.
3
A systematic review of crisis interventions used in the emergency department: recommendations for pediatric care and research.急诊科使用的危机干预措施的系统评价:儿科护理与研究建议
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Dec;26(12):952-62. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fe9211.
4
Patient perceptions of emergency department fast track: a prospective pilot study comparing two models of care.患者对急诊科快速通道的认知:一项比较两种护理模式的前瞻性试点研究
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Aug;17(3):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
5
Making an IMPACT on emergency department flow: improving patient processing assisted by consultant at triage.对急诊科流程产生影响:在分诊时由顾问协助改善患者处理流程。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):537-41. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003913.
6
Parental perception of waiting time and its influence on parental satisfaction in an urban pediatric emergency department: are parents accurate in determining waiting time?城市儿科急诊科家长对候诊时间的认知及其对家长满意度的影响:家长对候诊时间的判断准确吗?
South Med J. 2003 Sep;96(9):880-3. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000054911.92771.41.
7
Team assignment system: expediting emergency department care.团队分配系统:加快急诊科护理速度。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
8
Waiting time and assessment of patient satisfaction in a large reference emergency department: a prospective cohort study, France.法国一家大型参考急诊科的候诊时间及患者满意度评估:一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;16(4):177-82. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32831016a6.
9
Patient satisfaction in the emergency department--a survey of pediatric patients and their parents.急诊科患者满意度——一项针对儿科患者及其家长的调查
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(12):1379-88. doi: 10.1197/aemj.9.12.1379.
10
A pediatric emergency department follow-up system: completing the cycle of care.一个儿科急诊科随访系统:完善护理周期
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Oct;17(5):392-5. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200110000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Dedicated Pediatricians in Emergency Department: Shorter Waiting Times and Lower Costs.急诊科的专业儿科医生:等待时间更短,成本更低。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161149. eCollection 2016.
2
Heart Surgery Waiting Time: Assessing the Effectiveness of an Action.心脏手术等待时间:评估一项行动的有效性。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Aug 26;17(8):e24851. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.24851. eCollection 2015 Aug.
3
A prospective evaluation of missed injuries in trauma patients, before and after formalising the trauma tertiary survey.
前瞻性评估创伤患者在正式进行创伤三级检查前后的漏诊损伤。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):222-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2226-z.