Suppr超能文献

对急诊科流程产生影响:在分诊时由顾问协助改善患者处理流程。

Making an IMPACT on emergency department flow: improving patient processing assisted by consultant at triage.

作者信息

Terris J, Leman P, O'Connor N, Wood R

机构信息

Emergency Department, St Thomas's Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):537-41. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003913.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether initial patient consult by senior clinicians reduces numbers of patients waiting to be seen as an indirect measure of waiting time throughout the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

An emergency medicine consultant and a senior ED nurse (G or F grade), known as the IMPACT team, staffed the triage area for four periods of four hours per week, Monday to Friday between 9 am to 5 pm for three months between December 2001 and February 2002 when staffing levels permitted. Patients normally triaged by a nurse in this area instead had an early consultation with the IMPACT team. Data were collected prospectively on all patients seen by the IMPACT team. The number of patients waiting to be seen (for triage, in majors and in minors) was assessed every two hours during the IMPACT sessions and at corresponding times when no IMPACT team was operational.

RESULTS

There was an overall reduction in the number of patients waiting to be seen in the department from 18.3 to 5.5 (p<0.0001) at formal two hourly assessments. The largest difference was seen in minors. Of the patients seen at triage by the IMPACT team, 48.9% were discharged home immediately after assessment and treatment. With the IMPACT team present, no patient waited more than four hours for initial clinical consult.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a senior clinical team for initial patient consultation, the numbers of patients waiting fell dramatically throughout the ED. Many patients can be effectively treated and discharged after initial consult by the IMPACT team.

摘要

目的

评估资深临床医生进行的初始患者会诊是否能减少急诊科等待就诊患者的数量,以此作为衡量整个急诊科等待时间的间接指标。

方法

一个由急诊医学顾问和一名资深急诊科护士(G级或F级)组成的“影响团队”,在2001年12月至2002年2月期间,每周一至周五上午9点至下午5点,在人员配备允许的情况下,每周四个时间段,每个时间段四小时,在分诊区域值班。该区域通常由护士进行分诊的患者,改为由“影响团队”进行早期会诊。前瞻性收集“影响团队”诊治的所有患者的数据。在“影响团队”值班期间,每两小时评估一次等待就诊患者的数量(分诊、重症和轻症),在“影响团队”未值班的相应时间也进行评估。

结果

在正式的每两小时评估中,科室等待就诊患者的数量总体从18.3人减少到5.5人(p<0.0001)。在轻症患者中差异最大。“影响团队”在分诊时诊治的患者中,48.9%在评估和治疗后立即出院回家。在“影响团队”值班时,没有患者等待初始临床会诊超过四小时。

结论

通过使用资深临床团队进行初始患者会诊,整个急诊科等待就诊的患者数量大幅下降。许多患者在“影响团队”进行初始会诊后可以得到有效治疗并出院。

相似文献

3
Team triage improves emergency department efficiency.
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):542-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003665.
4
Team assignment system: expediting emergency department care.
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
5
Effect of introduction of nurse triage on waiting times in a South African emergency department.
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):395-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.049411.
8
Effect of mandated nurse-patient ratios on patient wait time and care time in the emergency department.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):545-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00727.x.
9
Computer modeling of patient flow in a pediatric emergency department using discrete event simulation.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802c611e.
10
Triage rapid initial assessment by doctor (TRIAD) improves waiting time and processing time of the emergency department.
Emerg Med J. 2006 Apr;23(4):262-5; discussion 262-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.025254.

引用本文的文献

1
A physician-nurse team adjacent to triage shortens length of stay and left-without-being-seen rates.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;12(1):26-34. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.248. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Licensed Practical Nurses in Team Triage: A Safe Way to Address Nursing Shortages in the Emergency Department.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 25;15(6):e40926. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40926. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Early Rooming Triage: Accuracy and Demographic Factors Associated with Clinical Acuity.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 28;23(2):145-151. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.12.53873.
6
Impact of Emergency Department Phlebotomists on Left-Before-Treatment-Completion Rates.
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):681-687. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.41736. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of vital signs on triage decisions.
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;39(3):223-32. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.121524.
2
Faculty triage shortens emergency department length of stay.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;8(10):990-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01099.x.
3
How reliable is emergency department triage?
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;34(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70248-9.
4
Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 May;16(3):179-81. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.3.179.
5
Inconsistency of emergency department triage. Emergency Department Operations Research Working Group.
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;32(4):431-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70171-4.
6
Triage: limitations in predicting need for emergent care and hospital admission.
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):493-500. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70240-8.
7
Consultant triage of minor cases in an accident and emergency department.
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Dec;10(4):328-30. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.4.328.
8
9
Evaluation of nurse triage in a British accident and emergency department.
BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):876-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6831.876.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验