Lu Guo-chun, Fang Fu, Li De-chuan
Department of General Surgery, Tonglu First People's Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;32(2):152-5.
To compare the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-Fu/LV) plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer.
The clinicopathological data of 118 patients with stage III colorectal cancer were studied retrospectively. The patients were assigned to receive either FOLFOX4 regimen (n = 76) or XELOX regimen (n = 42). 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and adverse events as end points were compared between the two groups.
The number of patients that failed to finish 8 cycles was higher in FOLFOX4 group (28 vs. 8, P = 0.044). There was no significant difference for 3-year DFS and all grades adverse events between the two groups. However, the FOLFOX4 group showed more grade 3/4 neutropenia (31.6% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.039) and central venous catheter-associated complication (11.8% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.205), while XELOX showed more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (19.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.038) and hand-foot syndrome (11.9% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.012).
The results of this analysis indicate that XELOX and FOLFOX4 regimens have very similar efficacy as an adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, but XELOX may be safer than FOLFOX4.
比较卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(XELOX)方案与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(5-Fu/LV)联合奥沙利铂(FOLFOX4)方案作为Ⅲ期结直肠癌辅助化疗的疗效和毒性。
回顾性研究118例Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。患者被分配接受FOLFOX4方案(n = 76)或XELOX方案(n = 42)。比较两组以3年无病生存期(DFS)和不良事件为终点指标的情况。
FOLFOX4组未完成8个周期治疗的患者数量较多(28例对8例,P = 0.044)。两组之间3年DFS和所有级别的不良事件无显著差异。然而,FOLFOX4组3/4级中性粒细胞减少症更多(31.6%对14.3%,P = 0.039)以及中心静脉导管相关并发症更多(11.8%对4.8%,P = 0.205),而XELOX组3/4级血小板减少症更多(19.0%对6.6%,P = 0.038)和手足综合征更多(11.9%对1.3%,P = 0.012)。
该分析结果表明,XELOX和FOLFOX4方案作为Ⅲ期结肠癌辅助化疗的疗效非常相似,但XELOX可能比FOLFOX4更安全。