Suppr超能文献

费城染色体阴性成人急性淋巴细胞白血病患者在首次和第二次完全缓解时,行全强度和低强度预处理条件下的同胞或无关供者移植的结局。

The outcome of full-intensity and reduced-intensity conditioning matched sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first and second complete remission.

机构信息

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Blood. 2010 Jul 22;116(3):366-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264077. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and compared outcomes of 93 patients older than 16 years after RIC with 1428 patients receiving full-intensity conditioning for allografts using sibling and unrelated donors for Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first or second complete remission. RIC conditioning included busulfan 9 mg/kg or less (27), melphalan 150 mg/m(2) or less (23), low-dose total body irradiation (TBI; 36), and others (7). The RIC group was older (median 45 vs 28 years, P < .001) and more received peripheral blood grafts (73% vs 43%, P < .001) but had similar other prognostic factors. The RIC versus full-intensity conditioning groups had slightly, but not significantly, less acute grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease (39% vs 46%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (34% vs 42%), yet similar transplantation-related mortality. RIC led to slightly more relapse (35% vs 26%, P = .08) yet similar age-adjusted survival (38% vs 43%, P = .39). Multivariate analysis showed that conditioning intensity did not affect transplantation-related mortality (P = .92) or relapse risk (P = .14). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly improved overall survival with: Karnofsky performance status more than 80, first complete remission, lower white blood count, well-matched unrelated or sibling donors, transplantation since 2001, age younger than 30 years, and conditioning with TBI, but no independent impact of conditioning intensity. RIC merits further investigation in prospective trials of adult ALL.

摘要

我们研究了减低强度预处理(RIC)的疗效,并比较了 93 例年龄大于 16 岁的患者和 1428 例接受同胞和非血缘供者全强度预处理的患者的结局,这些患者为费城染色体阴性的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL),处于首次或第二次完全缓解期。RIC 预处理方案包括马利兰 150mg/m2 或以下(23),白消安 9mg/kg 或以下(27),低剂量全身照射(TBI;36),和其他(7)。RIC 组年龄较大(中位数 45 岁比 28 岁,P<0.001),更多患者接受外周血移植(73%比 43%,P<0.001),但其他预后因素相似。RIC 组与全强度预处理组的急性Ⅱ-Ⅳ度移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率(39%比 46%)和慢性 GVHD 发生率(34%比 42%)虽略有降低,但无显著差异,然而移植相关死亡率相似。RIC 组复发率略高(35%比 26%,P=0.08),但年龄调整后的生存率相似(38%比 43%,P=0.39)。多变量分析显示预处理强度不影响移植相关死亡率(P=0.92)或复发风险(P=0.14)。多变量分析显示,Karnofsky 体能状态评分>80,首次完全缓解,白细胞计数较低,供者匹配良好(无关或同胞),2001 年后接受移植,年龄小于 30 岁,以及 TBI 预处理与总生存时间明显改善相关,但预处理强度无独立影响。RIC 值得在成人 ALL 的前瞻性试验中进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Adults.老年人的异体移植
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1475:9-40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-84988-6_2.
2
Transplant in ALL: who, when, and how?急性淋巴细胞白血病的移植:对象、时机及方式?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):93-101. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000533.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.定义预处理强度:工作定义。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec;15(12):1628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验