Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics at The University of Melbourne, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, & School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria.
Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Apr;21(1):12-8. doi: 10.1071/he10012.
Health promotion with adolescents spans many contexts including schools. Income and its distribution, education and social exclusion are key social determinants of health. Exclusionary school policies such as school suspension contribute to exclusion, increase the likelihood of school dropout (reducing educational and subsequent employment opportunities), and negatively impact on student wellbeing. Often excluded students are from socio-economically disadvantaged areas. This paper examines associations between area level socio-economic status (SES) and school suspension in Australian students.
Students (8,028) in years 6 (n = 4393) and 8 (n = 3635) completed a comprehensive social development survey administered in schools in 30 socio-economically stratified communities in 2006.
Associations between area level SES and school suspension were found. Relative to students in the lowest SES quartile communities, students in mid level and high SES had lower suspension rates. These effects remained after controlling for antisocial behaviour, gender, age and the established risk factors of poor family management, interaction with antisocial peers and academic failure.
Students living in low SES areas are exposed to higher rates of school suspension, at similar levels of adjustment problems. Assisting schools, particularly those with disadvantaged students, to foster school engagement is essential for schools committed to health promotion.
青少年健康促进涵盖了许多背景,包括学校。收入及其分配、教育和社会排斥是健康的关键社会决定因素。排斥性的学校政策,如学校停学,会导致排斥,增加辍学的可能性(减少教育和随后的就业机会),并对学生的幸福感产生负面影响。被排斥的学生往往来自社会经济处于不利地位的地区。本文研究了澳大利亚学生中地区社会经济地位(SES)与学校停学之间的关联。
2006 年,在 30 个社会经济分层社区的 2006 年,在 30 个社会经济分层社区的 30 所学校中,对参加了综合社会发展调查的 8 年级(n=4393)和 10 年级(n=3635)的学生进行了调查。
发现地区社会经济地位与学校停学之间存在关联。与处于最低 SES 四分位社区的学生相比,处于中 SES 和高 SES 社区的学生停学率较低。在控制了反社会行为、性别、年龄以及不良家庭管理、与反社会同伴互动和学业失败等既定风险因素后,这些影响仍然存在。
生活在低 SES 地区的学生面临更高的停学率,同时也面临着类似程度的调整问题。协助学校,特别是那些有弱势学生的学校,培养学生对学校的参与感,对于致力于促进健康的学校至关重要。