Federal Office of Public Health FOPH, Food Safety Division, Stauffacherstrasse 101, 8004 Zürich, Switzerland.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;58(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
Based on 289 public pesticide evaluations, geometric means of subchronic/chronic No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) ratios of 2.6, 2.5 and 1.6 in mice, rats and dogs were calculated. The 75th percentiles are 5.5, 5.1 and 3.2. Higher ratios correlate with increased dose spacing in chronic studies and may be mainly explained therewith. In rats fed at constant pesticide concentrations in feed, the mean chronic dose decreases by 1.7- and 2.7-fold compared to the subchronic and subacute phase. These dose decreases match the subchronic/chronic NOAEL ratios. The ratio of predicted rat chronic NOAEL (dose decrement adjusted subchronic NOAEL) to experimental chronic NOAEL is 1.5 and the 75th percentile is 3.0. In dietary risk assessment, the Acute Reference Dose and the Acceptable Daily Intake (derived from acute and chronic NOAEL) are compared to acute (IESTI) or mean (TMDI) exposure estimates. Because IESTI and TMDI base on acute or mean food consumption they differ by orders of magnitude for certain commodities. As subchronic and chronic NOAEL are similar, it remains to be shown whether pesticide intake estimates based on mean food consumption are adequate measures to compare against the ADI if repeated daily exposures considerably higher than mean exposures may occur.
基于 289 项公开的农药评估,计算出在小鼠、大鼠和犬中慢性/亚慢性无观察不良效应水平(NOAEL)比值的几何平均值分别为 2.6、2.5 和 1.6。75%分位数分别为 5.5、5.1 和 3.2。较高的比值与慢性研究中增加的剂量间隔相关,并且可以主要用其来解释。在以恒定农药浓度经饲料喂养的大鼠中,与亚慢性和亚急性阶段相比,慢性的平均剂量降低了 1.7-和 2.7 倍。这些剂量降低与亚慢性/慢性 NOAEL 比值相匹配。预测大鼠慢性 NOAEL(经剂量降低调整的亚慢性 NOAEL)与实验性慢性 NOAEL 的比值为 1.5,75%分位数为 3.0。在膳食风险评估中,急性参考剂量和可接受日摄入量(源自急性和慢性 NOAEL)与急性(IESTI)或平均(TMDI)暴露估计值进行比较。由于 IESTI 和 TMDI 基于急性或平均食物消耗,因此对于某些商品,它们的差异是数量级的。由于亚慢性和慢性 NOAEL 相似,因此仍有待证明,如果重复的每日暴露明显高于平均暴露,则基于平均食物消耗的农药摄入量估计值是否是与 ADI 进行比较的充分措施。