• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠内镜检查中的镇静:麻醉医生的视角

Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an anesthesiologist's perspective.

作者信息

Van der Linden Philippe

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, CHU Brugmann - HUDERF, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Digestion. 2010;82(2):102-5. doi: 10.1159/000285525. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1159/000285525
PMID:20407256
Abstract

Sedation is required to treat an ever increasing number of patients for medical diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, in particular in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Due to the apparent ease of administration of sedative techniques, and due to the shortage of anesthetic staff in many Western countries, sedation is being carried out more and more frequently by non-anesthesiologist doctors or even paramedical staff. Due to its pharmacokinetic properties, propofol has become the preferred sedative drug used by non-anesthesiologists. However, uncritical use of propofol by nonqualified persons might result in much higher complications rates and even fatal events. Several guidelines have been published with common issues, but also some significant differences. Whether they contribute to improved patient safety or not will depend on the practical application and interpretation of these guidelines. Although further evaluation is needed, computer-assisted systems might contribute to the safe administration of propofol through a better control of the level of sedation.

摘要

在医疗诊断或治疗过程中,尤其是在胃肠内镜检查中,需要对越来越多的患者进行镇静处理。由于镇静技术给药明显简便,且许多西方国家麻醉工作人员短缺,非麻醉医生甚至医护辅助人员进行镇静处理的情况越来越频繁。由于其药代动力学特性,丙泊酚已成为非麻醉医生首选的镇静药物。然而,非专业人员不加审慎地使用丙泊酚可能会导致更高的并发症发生率,甚至致命事件。已经发布了一些指南,这些指南有共同问题,但也存在一些显著差异。它们是否有助于提高患者安全性将取决于这些指南的实际应用和解读。尽管还需要进一步评估,但计算机辅助系统可能通过更好地控制镇静水平有助于丙泊酚的安全给药。

相似文献

1
Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an anesthesiologist's perspective.胃肠内镜检查中的镇静:麻醉医生的视角
Digestion. 2010;82(2):102-5. doi: 10.1159/000285525. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
2
Propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a gastroenterologist's perspective.丙泊酚镇静在胃肠内镜检查中的应用:胃肠病学家的观点。
Digestion. 2010;82(2):106-9. doi: 10.1159/000285554. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
3
The use of propofol by gastroenterologists: medico-legal issues.
Digestion. 2010;82(2):110-2. doi: 10.1159/000285570. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
4
Sedation by non-anesthesiologists: are opioids and benzodiazepines outdated?非麻醉医生实施的镇静:阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物过时了吗?
Digestion. 2010;82(2):100-1. doi: 10.1159/000287215. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
5
Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: the changing landscape.胃肠内镜检查的镇静:不断变化的形势
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Aug;20(4):359-64. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32827ab467.
6
Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia.非麻醉医师不应被允许给予异丙酚用于操作镇静:21 个欧洲国家麻醉学会的共识声明。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Aug;28(8):580-4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328348a977.
7
Anesthesiology and gastroenterology.麻醉学与胃肠病学。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2009 Mar;27(1):57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2008.10.007.
8
Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy.立场声明:非麻醉医师在胃肠内镜检查中使用丙泊酚。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;104(12):2886-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.607.
9
Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑及哌替啶用于胃肠内镜检查中的清醒镇静
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;95(6):1476-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02080.x.
10
[Drug sedation during digestive tract endoscopy: current trends].[消化道内镜检查期间的药物镇静:当前趋势]
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2009 Jul-Aug(4):32-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of guidelines and recommendations for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy: a narrative review.可弯曲支气管镜检查期间镇静的指南与建议的比较分析:一项叙述性综述
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Aug 20;34(177). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0045-2025. Print 2025 Jul.
2
Patient safety in an endoscopy unit: an observational retrospective analysis of reported incidents.内镜诊疗单位的患者安全:报告事件的观察性回顾性分析。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;71(2):137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.
内镜医师与麻醉医师在胃肠内镜检查中使用丙泊酚的比较:患者安全结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Can J Surg. 2018 Aug;61(4):226-236. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008117.
4
Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective study comparing nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol and monitored anesthesia care.胃肠内镜检查中的镇静:一项比较非麻醉医生给予丙泊酚和监护下麻醉护理的前瞻性研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Feb;3(1):E7-E13. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377835. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Recent advances in using propofol by non-anesthesiologists.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚的最新进展。
F1000 Med Rep. 2010 Nov 11;2:79. doi: 10.3410/M2-79.