Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2010 May;92(3):222-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891003670174.
Wagner's (2001) Logical Rorschach (LR) was designed to be a simple but reliable and valid system for assessing psychological distress and cognitive slippage using the Rorschach Inkblot Method (Exner, 2003). In this investigation, we administered the Rorschach to 50 adults with and without trauma histories. Scoring of the test followed both the Comprehensive System (CS; Exner, 2003) and the LR guidelines. Results indicate that the Perceptual Thinking Index (Exner, 2000, 2003), the CS-derived Trauma Content Index (Armstrong & Loewenstein, 1990) and Aggressive Past (Gacono & Meloy, 1994), and the LR Perceptual Accuracy Score (Wagner, 2001) scores were able to differentiate the 2 groups. Despite largely equivocal findings, it appears that some aspects of the LR may have some validity in the assessment of trauma-related phenomena.
Wagner（2001）的逻辑罗夏测验（LR）旨在通过罗夏墨迹测验方法（Exner，2003），成为一种简单但可靠和有效的系统，用于评估心理困扰和认知滑动。在这项研究中，我们对 50 名有和没有创伤史的成年人进行了罗夏测验。测试的评分遵循综合系统（CS；Exner，2003）和 LR 指南。结果表明，知觉思维指数（Exner，2000，2003）、CS 衍生的创伤内容指数（Armstrong 和 Loewenstein，1990）和攻击性过去（Gacono 和 Meloy，1994），以及 LR 的知觉准确性分数（Wagner，2001），可以区分这两组。尽管结果存在很大的不确定性，但似乎 LR 的某些方面在评估与创伤相关的现象方面具有一定的有效性。
