Baity M R, McDaniel P S, Hilsenroth M J
Department of Psychology, University of Arkansas, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2000 Apr;74(2):231-41. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7402_5.
Based on the recommendations of Baity and Hilsenroth (1999), this study further investigated the reliability and validity of the Rorschach Aggressive Content (AgC) variable developed by Gacono and Meloy (1994). Eighty-five aggressive objects identified by Gacono and Meloy, 19 potentially aggressive objects and 22 neutral (nonaggressive) objects were rated for aggressiveness based on the definition of AgC. Two hundred seventy-six participants rated objects on the Object Rating Scale (0-6), where a score of 0 indicates that an object does not fit the definition of AgC. In addition, objects rated a 4 (moderately aggressive) or higher were then classified into 5 qualitative groupings (weapons, animal/part of animal, environmental danger, fictional creature, and other). Analysis of the results indicates that the AgC list can be replicated and that objects rated as at least moderately aggressive (4) can be reliably classified into distinct categories. One-month test-retest reliability (r = .99) suggests that objects can be scored consistently using the definition of AgC and provides support for the utility of the AgC variable. Based on the results of this study, recommendations for the addition of the AgC variable to the list of content categories of Exner's (1993) Comprehensive System are presented and discussed along with scoring examples.
基于贝蒂和希尔森罗思（1999年）的建议，本研究进一步调查了加科诺和梅洛伊（1994年）开发的罗夏攻击性内容（AgC）变量的信度和效度。根据AgC的定义，对加科诺和梅洛伊确定的85个攻击性对象、19个潜在攻击性对象和22个中性（非攻击性）对象的攻击性进行了评分。276名参与者根据对象评定量表（0 - 6）对对象进行评分，其中0分表示一个对象不符合AgC的定义。此外，评分在4（中度攻击性）及以上的对象随后被分为5个定性类别（武器、动物/动物部分、环境危险、虚构生物和其他）。结果分析表明，AgC列表可以被复制，并且被评为至少中度攻击性（4）的对象可以可靠地分类到不同类别中。一个月的重测信度（r = 0.99）表明，可以使用AgC的定义对对象进行一致评分，并为AgC变量的效用提供了支持。基于本研究的结果，提出并讨论了将AgC变量添加到埃克斯纳（1993年）综合系统内容类别列表中的建议以及评分示例。
