Suppr超能文献

中国乙肝病毒输血风险:乙肝表面抗原检测的能力验证

Hepatitis B virus transfusion risk in China: proficiency testing for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen.

作者信息

Zhang R, Wang L, Li J

机构信息

National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, Dongdan, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2010 Oct;20(5):322-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2010.01007.x.

Abstract

Because of the high prevalence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV), HBsAg tests play an extremely significant role in donor screening in China. In our multicentre study, the HBsAg assays used in blood screening were evaluated for their analytical sensitivity and the ability to detect mutants. A panel of eight samples was sent to 85 blood banks. The panel included four HBsAg-positive serum samples at concentrations of 0·16, 0·46, 0·9 and 1·73 IU mL(-1) ; three recombinant HBsAg mutants (G145R, T131I and K141E) with defined concentrations and one negative sample. All laboratories were required to detect the samples with their routine procedures.All the 85 blood banks reported their results before the closing date, and 170 data sets were submitted. The wild-type samples at concentrations of 1·73 and 0·9 IU mL(-1) were correctly identified as positive in all data sets, whereas the other two samples (at concentrations 0·16 and 0·46 IU mL(-1) ) were not consistently detected as positive. Regarding the mutants, significantly different results were reported among all the assays involved. All users of Hepanostika HBsAg Ultra and most users (16/17) of Abbott Murex HBsAg Version 3 detected all mutant samples, whereas some of the commercial assays failed to detect any of the three mutant samples. Some HBsAg assays with unsatisfactory sensitivities and capabilities of mutant detection were used by a large percentage of blood banks, which might lead to a high transfusion risk in China. A list of assays of high sensitivity and good ability of mutant detection should be recommended for use in blood screening.

摘要

由于乙肝病毒(HBV)的高流行率,乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)检测在中国献血者筛查中发挥着极其重要的作用。在我们的多中心研究中,对用于血液筛查的HBsAg检测方法的分析灵敏度和检测突变体的能力进行了评估。一组8个样本被送往85家血库。该组样本包括4份浓度分别为0·16、0·46、0·9和1·73 IU/mL的HBsAg阳性血清样本;3份具有确定浓度的重组HBsAg突变体(G145R、T131I和K141E)以及1份阴性样本。所有实验室都被要求用其常规程序检测这些样本。所有85家血库均在截止日期前报告了结果,共提交了170组数据。浓度为1·73和0·9 IU/mL的野生型样本在所有数据集中均被正确鉴定为阳性,而其他两份样本(浓度为0·16和0·46 IU/mL)并未始终被检测为阳性。对于突变体,所有参与检测的方法报告的结果存在显著差异。所有使用Hepanostika HBsAg Ultra的用户以及大多数使用雅培Murex HBsAg第3版的用户(16/17)都检测到了所有突变体样本,而一些商业检测方法未能检测到任何一份三种突变体样本。很大比例的血库使用了一些灵敏度和突变体检测能力不令人满意的HBsAg检测方法,这可能会在中国导致较高的输血风险。应推荐一份灵敏度高且突变体检测能力良好的检测方法清单用于血液筛查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验