• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TROPHY研究:基于美国国家高血压教育计划联合委员会第七次报告中高血压定义的结果

TROPHY study: Outcomes based on the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Hypertension definition of hypertension.

作者信息

Julius Stevo, Kaciroti Niko, Egan Brent M, Nesbitt Shawna, Michelson Eric L

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Jan-Feb;2(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2007.07.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2007.07.005
PMID:20409883
Abstract

Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) investigated whether pharmacological treatment of prehypertension prevents or postpones stage 1 hypertension. Hypertension was originally defined when a participant had blood pressure (BP) >/=140 and/or >/=90 mm Hg at any three clinic visits over 4 years. Contemporary guidelines define hypertension if the BP is >/=140 and/or >/=90 at two consecutive visits. TROPHY results were recalculated based on the current definition. Participants with repeated BP of 130 - 139 and/or 85 - 89 mm Hg were randomly assigned to 2 years of candesartan or placebo, followed by 2 years of placebo for all. All participants received lifestyle counseling at every visit. When participants reached hypertension, antihypertensive treatment was initiated. The 4-year incidence of hypertension was significantly (P < .001) lower than previously reported in the placebo (-11.3%) and candesartan (-11.0%) groups. During the first 2 years, hypertension developed in 162 placebo and 53 candesartan participants (relative risk reduction [RRR], 68%; P < .001; original report 66%; P < .001). After 4 years, hypertension occurred in 197 placebo and 165 candesartan participants (RRR, 18%; P < .009; original report 16%; P < .007). The new definition resulted in a lower incidence of hypertension, but the outcomes were remarkably similar with both definitions and confirmed our original findings.

摘要

预防高血压试验(TROPHY)研究了对高血压前期进行药物治疗是否能预防或延缓1期高血压的发生。最初,当参与者在4年中的任何三次门诊就诊时血压(BP)≥140和/或≥90 mmHg时被定义为高血压。当代指南规定,若连续两次就诊时血压≥140和/或≥90,则定义为高血压。TROPHY的结果根据当前定义重新计算。血压反复处于130 - 139和/或85 - 89 mmHg的参与者被随机分配接受2年的坎地沙坦或安慰剂治疗,随后所有人再接受2年的安慰剂治疗。所有参与者每次就诊时均接受生活方式咨询。当参与者达到高血压标准时,开始进行抗高血压治疗。高血压的4年发病率显著低于安慰剂组(-11.3%)和坎地沙坦组(-11.0%)之前报告的数据(P < .001)。在最初的2年中,162名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者和53名接受坎地沙坦治疗的参与者出现了高血压(相对风险降低[RRR],68%;P < .001;原报告为66%;P < .001)。4年后,197名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者和165名接受坎地沙坦治疗的参与者出现了高血压(RRR,18%;P < .009;原报告为16%;P < .007)。新定义导致高血压发病率降低,但两种定义下的结果非常相似,证实了我们最初的发现。

相似文献

1
TROPHY study: Outcomes based on the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Hypertension definition of hypertension.TROPHY研究:基于美国国家高血压教育计划联合委员会第七次报告中高血压定义的结果
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Jan-Feb;2(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2007.07.005.
2
Blood pressure variability causes spurious identification of hypertension in clinical studies: a computer simulation study.血压变异性在临床研究中导致高血压的误判:一项计算机模拟研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jan;21(1):85-91. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.25.
3
Should the results of TROPHY affect the JNC 7 definition of prehypertension?“降压治疗预防高血压研究(TROPHY)”的结果是否会影响美国国家联合委员会第7次报告(JNC 7)对高血压前期的定义?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007 Jun;9(3):202-5. doi: 10.1007/s11906-007-0036-0.
4
Prehypertension: should we be treating with pharmacologic therapy?高血压前期:我们应该进行药物治疗吗?
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Aug;2(4):305-14. doi: 10.1177/1753944708094226.
5
Is low-risk hypertension fact or fiction? cardiovascular risk profile in the TROPHY study.低风险高血压是事实还是虚构?TROPHY研究中的心血管风险概况。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Jul;18(7):980-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.01.021.
6
Is it time to treat prehypertension?是时候治疗高血压前期了吗?
Hypertens Res. 2008 Sep;31(9):1681-6. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.1681.
7
Effects of weight loss and sodium reduction intervention on blood pressure and hypertension incidence in overweight people with high-normal blood pressure. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group.体重减轻和钠摄入减少干预对血压正常高值的超重人群血压及高血压发病率的影响。高血压预防试验,第二阶段。高血压预防协作研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Mar 24;157(6):657-67.
8
Chronotherapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in essential hypertension: improved sleep-time blood pressure control with bedtime dosing.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合时辰治疗原发性高血压:睡前服药改善睡眠时间血压控制。
Chronobiol Int. 2011 Aug;28(7):601-10. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.589935. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
9
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
10
The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.“总理干预措施”帮助参与者遵循“终止高血压膳食方法”饮食模式以及当前的膳食参考摄入量建议。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Sep;107(9):1541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk: Direct Association with Blood Pressure Values.高血压与心血管风险:与血压值的直接关联。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Sep;121(7):e20240459. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240459.
2
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 10;74(10):e177-e232. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
3
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
4
Hypertension and cardiovascular disease: Is a treatment strategy focused on high risk sufficient?高血压与心血管疾病:聚焦于高危人群的治疗策略是否足够?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul 1;20(8):1146-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.13324.
5
Blood Pressure Management: Beyond the Guidelines.血压管理:超越指南
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):969-971. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11036. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
Should Pre-hypertension Be Treated?高血压前期是否需要治疗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Oct 18;19(11):91. doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0789-z.
7
Trends in Prehypertension and Hypertension Risk Factors in US Adults: 1999-2012.1999 - 2012年美国成年人高血压前期和高血压危险因素的趋势
Hypertension. 2017 Aug;70(2):275-284. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.09004. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
Effectiveness of Chlorthalidone Plus Amiloride for the Prevention of Hypertension: The PREVER-Prevention Randomized Clinical Trial.氯噻酮联合阿米洛利预防高血压的有效性:PREVER-预防随机临床试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Dec 13;5(12):e004248. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004248.
9
Prehypertension--prevalence, health risks, and management strategies.高血压前期——患病率、健康风险和管理策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 May;12(5):289-300. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.17. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
10
Preventing the progression of prehypertension to hypertension: role of antihypertensives.预防高血压前期进展为高血压:抗高血压药物的作用
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):505. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0505-1.